Saturday, January 29, 2011

Al Sharpton And The Hijacking Of King.......By Himself



You probably do not have the Flash Player (Get Adobe Flash Player Here) installed for your browser or the video files are misplaced on your server!



The biggest hijacking of King came on that day that August 2010 day that Sharpton points to.
He stood on the stairs of Dunbar High School and told America that he was seeking "quality education".

Friday, January 28, 2011

Elon James White - Comedic Master Of "Keep Your Enemies On Trial" By Ridiculing Them Tears Up Over A Black Mother Arrested For Education Fraud

As many of you are kept attentively laughing at your ideological enemies - the two points that you miss are:

  • An enemy, regardless of how insignificant he is can be promoted into front page news and your progressive-fundamentalist friends scour the nation seeking material to fortify their "bit" for your consumption
  • In the process of executing the first bullet point they are unable to promote a message that effectively addresses the primary challenges that confront the Black community
In aggregate - it is no laughing matter.

First let me get these two videos out of the way, the one made by E.JW I found after clicking through and discovering that this is the Progressive-Fundamentalist comedian who's comedic rantings are good enough for HuffPo - before they even created their "Black collection" of content - which debuts later this year.

A White Republican Conservative Tea Party Election Threat In Illinois Says That Black Males Would Rather Sell Drugs Than Pursue Education



Now, Mr White - (I am talking to Mr Elon James White not the "White man" who he is talking about) I agree with you that the "White man" Al Reynolds (R-IL) said that Black men prefer to sell drugs than get an education that he was being ignorant.  Thankfully Champaign IL does not have a lot of Black people for him to join the school board and harm our bid for education.  Also since "Mr Whitey" lost his bid for a seat of power - I am sure you can agree that he - himself is not a "threat to Black people".  Instead his value as a target is his association with the Republican Party and the Tea Party is what you are creaming about.  A varitable trifecta for you.

Perhaps if you could coax Mr Reynolds to travel over to Indianapolis or Gary then you could find some Black people in close proximity to curse him out for his ignorance.


View Larger Map

I am one step ahead of you though. It is not PROXIMITY to Black people that make for an offense. Indeed the KKK snowman in Idaho likely had no heat from a brownskinned body that every came near enough to melt a single snowflake which made up its body. To the "Racism Chaser" who actively purses insults in order to add them to their collection - proximity is not an important criteria.

As of the 2000 census[5], 67,518 people, 27,071 households, and 12,452 families resided in Champaign. The population density was 3,974.6 people per square mile (1,534.4/km²). There were 28,556 housing units at an average density of 1,681.0/sq mi (648.9/km²). The racial makeup of the city was 73.16% White, 15.62% African-American, 0.24% Native American, 6.83% Asian, 0.03% Pacific Islander, 1.94% from other races, and 2.19% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino individuals of any race made up 4.03% of the population.

I take it that the fact that this clown lost shows that the White voters of the city and state did not buy into his B.S.?

But wait a minute, Mr White. (You, not the White guy Reynolds) what about the other places where there is an unfortunately low rate of Black male graduation and unacceptably high rates of high rates of criminal activity? Is someone allowed to call out the places - absent the maliciousness of Reynolds and have you and other "Progressive Defenders Of Blackness" accept these facts but also note that Mr Reynolds could never get elected in these places? That people that YOU favor can get elected despite these conditions?

Where On Earth Did The (Racist) Republican Reynolds Get The Idea About The Connection Between Black Males And Drugs? He Must Be On Drugs, Indeed!



You probably do not have the Flash Player (Get Adobe Flash Player Here) installed for your browser or the video files are misplaced on your server!




Elon James White - Beyond The Jokes & Obfuscation

Move away from the jokes and the indictment against his ideological adversaries and it appears that Mr White bombs on stage in front of his microphone.
The Black woman who got arrested for "theft of pubic services" was merely attempting to do what the "Black Flight Progressives" legally do because of their ability to MOVE:  Vacate the "Mission Accomplished" areas where there are favorable people in power, as they go to the places where there ideological enemies are in power, in pursuit of higher quality services for the improvement of their family's permanent interests.

The "Emperor Has No Clothes" moment for the Black Quasi-Socialist Progressive-Fundamentalist Racism Chaser is seen when he is forced to return to his district that he purports to be "struggling on behalf of" and look directly at what he has perpetuated per the grand obfuscation that they have erected upon our people.

To make this issue about this "one Black woman" without also looking at who sits in the seat of power over the institutions that she was forced to evade IS the INJUSTICE here.

With all due respect - I cannot fault the Black and White operatives who are embedded within our community consciousness, constantly hijacking it for their own ideological and political purposes.  I am forced to blame the Black Rank & File who's own hatred has ALLOWED them to be drawn into the grand scheme.   Until these "larval elements" are escorted out of the "community consciousness domain" and out to the periphery - then the masses of Black people are the ENABLERS of this issue.

Po And Bare Foot


From Salon.com "Black" area:
My initial reaction to this was outrage. I sat at my computer, heart pounding, eyes tearing, because when you peel off all the layers, you have this: a woman (who works with special education children and was attending school for her teaching degree) is being vilified because she wanted something better for her children. And we can't possibly ignore the racial aspect of this situation. A poor BLACK woman on public assistance is being jailed for sending her kids to the rich white school. I'm not arguing whether this is how it should be looked at; I'm saying that is how it is looked at. It's questionable at this point whether the teaching degree she's been working toward will be allowed, because she has a felony charge against her. A family's life is in virtual ruins because of this situation.

And many say she deserves this.

Reading comments from residents of the town she "stole" the education from say that this is fair. They pay a lot of money for that school. Rules are rules. If you don't live there you have to pay $800 in order to attend and she did not do so. In black and white terms (no pun intended) this is true. But is anything black and white? Can we truly look at this situation and call it fair? Are we a country that would put a scarlet letter on this woman because of where she sent her kids to school? She didn't forge $20 bills and buy electronics and diamonds. She didn't pretend to be a victim of 9/11 and try to claim special funds.

She sent her kids to school.

To judge this simply as a case of fraud is to ignore the surrounding circumstances. Some say that, legally speaking, "circumstances" don't matter. But if you murder someone they specifically have to figure out if it was a crime of passion, was it self-defense or was it premeditated. Each crime receives wildly different sentences. The bottom line is that a person is dead. But somehow that's not black and white. They say Williams-Bolar was judged by a jury of her peers. Was she really? Was it a group of poor minorities trying to finally have a chance at the supposed American dream? Were these "peers" people whose families have tried for generations to rise from the injustice and inequalities that they -- literally -- had nothing to do with?

Show me these "peers."

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Progressives Bring Up Fox News As A Means Of Refracting Attention Away From MSNBC

Did you ever notice:
  • When an interviewer (regardless of his own bias or lack there of) asks a progressive about the right-wing bias at Fox News the conversation remains focused upon Fox.  They will go down the list of all of the hosts and their bias.  No mention of MSNBC will ever come up.
  • When an interviewer asks a progressive about the left-wing bias at MSNBC the FIRST thing out of their mouth is a reference to FOX News.  They play a desperate game of "hot potato".   Instead of defending or justifying their positions they are stronger on the attack - keeping their enemies on trial.

It is rather amusing to hear a Baltimore Sun entertainment writer make the case that even though the departed Keith Olbermann tried to sound like Edward R Murrow - he in fact was more like Joseph McCarthy.


The MSNBC (short lived) host made a mistake by including a snippet of Keith Olbermann in on a list of "loud mouths" on the news. He should have kept it safe and included only right-wing blowhards.



I have stated previously that the progressive-fundamentalist doesn't believe that his "hatred" is the same type of "hatred" that is used by the right-wing. The right has deep seeded hatred. The left's hatred is only in defense against the initiated attacks from the right. They are otherwise peace loving people. IF the right-wing simply behaved themselves - (and allowed the left to "evolve" favorably the society as they want to) - then everything would be peaceful.

The truth is that they are as bigoted as the extremists on the right. Their hyper focus on their enemies is a sign of their hatred. Their inability to define the means by which THEIR OWN theories might be implemented while avoiding government oppression (in the way that is favorable to them) shows their need for congregational unity over an effective plan.

In truth BOTH left and right are merely running the same game. Anyone who chooses to fuse their own development interests into one of these two "teams" is part of the problem and they will ultimately lose.

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

The Root.com - Add Another Black Progressive-Fundamenalist Blog That Seeks An Unmolested Channel For Their Propaganda



When blog rules are clearly published - warning of the consequences foul language or harassment of individual bloggers - when these rules are not enough to defend the propagandists against a force that confounds the messages that are a part of their agenda - they apply "editors discretion" to get rid of the challenge.

Those who control the Delete key - need not worry about is projected when they hit the "Publish" button.

One would assume that in the power and brilliance of their message - as proven by the mass following - that they would be able to counter any countervailing threat that I represent.  After all - I am but an "ignorant Black conservative" who can't think for himself.  I follow "Massa's" every queue.  If my main "Massas - Rush Limubaugh and Glenn Beck" are themselves stupid - then what I project per their instruction is "stupid" and should be easily put down by the simplest of arguments.

For those blog sites that favor Black people with a "Twitter account" to relay their views to a mass of other Black people - people like me are disfavored.  I have the audacity to not only disagree with them but to tell them WHY they are wrong and the damage to our community's need for competency development is the consequence.

They favor Black people who will follow along with agreement with the prevailing line.  When they are challenged by another who is disinclined to agree with them the chant of "Racism" often follows.

Make no mistake about it - I do not view "The Root.com", "The Grio.com" or the "NAACP" as anything more than a cluster of individuals with a prevailing ideology.   They have no more "official" capacity that need be afforded them than if they an individual with a Wordpress account.   Their legitimacy is only a function of their utility to the community's permanent interests.

The Root.com and other elements of the Black Press Establishment seek to project and defend their IDEOLOGY.  No amount of evidence as provided by the places where their ideology reigns supreme is going to provide enough "constructive feedback" for them to take a more transparent approach in their methodology.

The placement of a few "conservative" content providers on their board is not evidence of balance.  BALANCE comes when every content provider is held to a universal mandate under which the ideological methodology that they promote must be subordinate to.

It is when the Black Establishment Machine fuses it self to an ideology and a party - that we see the entrenchment which has them looking past the results that they have achieved per their "mission accomplishment" and instead keeping us all focused on our mission of retaining their power and projected forward on the intent for more power in the American Political Domain.

I don't get mad when the inevitable banning from boards that traffic in propaganda for the sake of "Ideological Unity Enforcement".    It merely shows how entrenched this ideological force that prefers UNITY over RESULTS need to be pushed out of our racial consciousness nucleus before an improved set of results can be had.

Monday, January 24, 2011

Progressive-Fundamentalists: Our Hatred And The Use Of The Label "Stupid" Is Not The Same When Bigots Do It



Focus people.   THIS AIN'T ABOUT SARAH PALIN.

If you listen to various Progressive-Fundamentalist Politicos and Media Operatives they are now using the same words of slander against their ideological adversaries that were called HATEFUL and RACIST when White bigots used or inferred the same against Black people in the past.

Everyone Who Disagrees With Us Are "Stupid"

There is no such thing as "absolute hatred".
History shows that one group of people can "congregationally masturbate" themselves into justifying their tactics against some other group because they are convinced that they deserve it.  The words and tactics that are called "hateful" or full of "racial innuendo" can be co-opted and precipitously used by that same group - without any particular observation of their organic offense.

Only "civility" that is derived from our will to be civilized can make that which is "hatred" universally applicable and enforced.

  • Tea Parties - Racist
  • Sarah Palin - Stupid
  • Rush Limbaugh - Idiot
  • Republican Candidates Of 2010 - Extremists 
Of course calling Obama a "Socialist" is proof that one is a racist.



The Dutiful Tag Teaming Of The "Progressive Who Is A Democrat Who Is Black" With His White Snarling Fox Liberal Bigots Without Calling For Their Consciousness

 Immediately after the shooting in Tuscon the "Black Progressive Establishment" in the media and in the politics followed the lead of their White Snarling Fox thought leaders in assigning blame as to the shooter's motivation - long before his face even hit the wires.  Their priorities are evident with a mere perusal of the most popular subject matter - DESPITE - their labeling of their blogs as of "Black Community Interest".


These are more accurately defined as "Anti-Conservative"/"Anti-Republican" blogs, no possible claim that their goal is to advance the permanent interests of the Black community - since they focus upon the subject so infrequently.  The ONLY claim that they can make is that they represent the POPULAR ideological and political sentiments of the Black community.



 The Feigned Offense In Reaction To "Hate Speech"
The use of offensive to "hate speech" is merely a tool for indictment.  This month's edition of "Ebony Magazine" lists the "Top 15 Racial Insults Against Obama".  The editors of Ebony didn't quite feel motivated to tell their progressive-fundamentalist hate mongerers to "respect the office of the President" for any of the previous 43 men who served in this seat.  For some reason only THIS president compelled them to make such a listing.  

By accusing one's enemy of having nefarious motivations for their opposition to otherwise "good policy" their goal is to de-legitimize the position of the opponents, causing them to document the date that they "stopped beating their wife".  

 Despite the fact that a long list of similar offenses can be heard on "their side" - it is the responsibility for the other side to identify these offenses.  There is no self policing of the standard.

I would prefer that both sides stop with their petty and hateful antics - as in both cases - the use of these tactics insure that transparent debate on the issue never takes place.  

Absent The Enforcement Of Integrity The Only Thing We Can Say About Our Historical Enemies Is That They Got Into Power First, Getting The Jump Upon Us

 The assumption of the progressive-fundamentalist is that few people see exactly what they are doing.  They retain the "moral and intellectual high ground" and they only need to have their loyal followers to echo their own sentiments.

Unfortunately it is the Black community that is placed at risk once this "other side" makes note that their call for higher level political discourse  was merely a demand for " 'Conservative' White racists" to check themselves.  If and when they make note of the ruse that is not enforced on "all sides" then don't be surprised when the self-restraint is dismantled.

At this point the flawed strategy where there was failure to build up the organic competencies within our communities will be exposed.

Sunday, January 23, 2011

The Grio.com Reviles Reagan From 30 Years Ago More Than Their Ideological Friends Of To-Damned-Day

Reagan Revisionism Can't Revive Reagan's Image Among Blacks

Upon reading the liturgy of various Black Progressive-Fundamentalists my constant attempts to rationalize their line of thinking by affixing their fixation against their enemies to some more PROPORTIONAL accounting of the forces arrayed against our community interests - forces me to understand - that they are "Speaking In Tongues".

They have no interest in maintaining proper proportions per a REPRESENTATIVE MODEL of what ails us.  They goal is "Ideological Unity Enforcement". 

Later today I will embark upon a new series.   It will key in upon my observation that - "While Korean hair care magazines strangely have the headshots of Black women as evidence that this is their target market for profit ----  the Black political press has headshots of ' Tea Parties' and 'Sarah Palin' as proof of their intended profit.

Response to David Love:
[quote]When he ran for the White House in 1980, Ronald Reagan kicked off his campaign in Philadelphia, Mississippi, where the Klan murdered three civil rights workers 16 years earlier. [/quote]

Mr Love:

When the Democratic Presidential Primary candidates gathered in Philadelphia PA yet failed to say anything about the over 150 Black people MURDERED in the city - not 16 years earlier but in 2007 - WERE YOU BOTHERED by their failure to acknowledge these victims? Or was their collective silence justified because none of them wanted to condemn their party brothers that control the city for their failure to keep the people in the city safe?

Ironically though the state of Pennsylvania TODAY is seen as 'The Most Deadly City For Black People" the slight against Black people that was manufactured by Jack White against Reagan from more than 30 years ago rings more powerful.

As we do a tour of the nation, looking at the various "Mission Accomplished Cities" where our people live in their highest concentrations, Mr Love, why is it that you can't seem to fly off of your ideological and partisan perch and call out the machine forces that are molesting their key permanent interests?

Whomever is running Flint, Camden, Cleveland, Detroit, Rochester, East St Louis and Gary should have to be scrutinized as to the question "Do They Like Black People?". The results had make it hard to affirm this. Unlike Reagan, however, the Black voting populace don't seem to be repudiating them.

Weren't we wearing Jherri Curls at the time that Reagan did his do? Look at how much time has passed yet he remains a key reference to Black people with your ideological fixation.

Friday, January 21, 2011

Will AfroSpear & "The Color Of Change" Sign The "Open Letter To The Left Establishment"?

Protest Obama.ORG - An Open Letter To The Left Establishment

There are far too many omissions on this list.
MORE IMPORTANTLY there are far too many on the list who have set up "campaign offices for 2012 FOR Obama" just as the President did the other day in Chicago.

20:37, Jan 18, Joey Smith, FL
Barack Obama to me is more dangerous with Bush. With Bush, the left was there to stop him. With Obama they're asleep or drinking the kool aid. What does it take for the left to know that Barack Obama killed the public option? That he doesn't care about your issues. Please liberals don't vote for him in 2012.



The Open Letter FROM The Left TO The Left
This letter is a call for active support of protest to Michael Moore, Norman Solomon, Katrina van den Heuvel, Michael Eric Dyson, Barbara Ehrenreich, Thomas Frank, Tom Hayden, Bill Fletcher Jr., Jesse Jackson Jr., and other high profile progressive supporters of the Obama electoral campaign.

With the Obama administration beginning its third year, it is by now painfully obvious that the predictions of even the most sober Obama supporters were overly optimistic. Rather than an ally, the administration has shown itself to be an implacable enemy of reform.

It has advanced repeated assaults on the New Deal safety net (including the previously sacrosanct Social Security trust fund), jettisoned any hope for substantive health care reform, attacked civil rights and environmental protections, and expanded a massive bailout further enriching an already bloated financial services and insurance industry. It has continued the occupation of Iraq and expanded the war in Afghanistan as well as our government’s covert and overt wars in South Asia and around the globe.

Along the way, the Obama administration, which referred to its left detractors as “f***ing retarded” individuals that required “drug testing,” stepped up the prosecution of federal war crime whistleblowers, and unleashed the FBI on those protesting the escalation of an insane war.

Obama’s recent announcement of a federal worker pay freeze is cynical, mean-spirited “deficit-reduction theater”. Slashing Bush’s plutocratic tax cuts would have made a much more significant contribution to deficit reduction but all signs are that the “progressive” president will cave to Republican demands for the preservation of George W. Bush’s tax breaks for the wealthy Few. Instead Obama’s tax cut plan would raise taxes for the poorest people in our country.

The election of Obama has not galvanized protest movements. To the contrary, it has depressed and undermined them, with the White House playing an active role in the discouragement and suppression of dissent – with disastrous consequences. The almost complete absence of protest from the left has emboldened the most right-wing elements inside and outside of the Obama administration to pursue and act on an ever more extreme agenda.

We are writing to you because you are well-known writers, bloggers and filmmakers with access to a range of old and new media, and you have in your power the capacity to help reignite the movement which brought millions onto the streets in February of 2003 but which has withered ever since. There are many thousands of progressives who follow your work closely and are waiting for a cue from you and others to act. We are asking you to commit yourself to actively supporting the protests of Obama administration policies which are now beginning to materialize.

In this connection we would like to mention a specific protest: the civil disobedience action being planned by Veterans for Peace involving Chris Hedges, Daniel Ellsberg, Joel Kovel, Medea Benjamin, Ray McGovern, several armed service veterans and others to take place in front of the White House on Dec. 16th.

Should you commit yourselves to backing this action and others sure to materialize in weeks and months ahead, what would otherwise be regarded as an emotional outburst of the “fringe left” will have a better chance of being seen as expressing the will of a substantial majority not only of the left, but of the American public at large. We believe that your support will help create the climate for larger and increasingly disruptive expressions of dissent – a development that is sorely needed and long overdue.

We hope that we can count on you to exercise the leadership that is required of all of us in these desperate times.

Best Regards,

Sen. James Abourezk
Tariq Ali
Rocky Anderson
Jared Ball
Russel Banks
Thomas Bias
Jean Bricmont
Noam Chomsky
Bruce Dixon
Frank Dorrel
Gidon Eshel
Jamilla El-Shafei
Okla Elliott
Norman Finkelstein
Glen Ford
Joshua Frank
Margaret Flowers M.D.
John Gerassi
Henry Giroux
Matt Gonzalez
Kevin Alexander Gray
Judd Greenstein
DeeDee Halleck
John Halle
Chris Hedges
Doug Henwood
Edward S. Herman
Jack Hirschman
Dahr Jamail
Derrick Jensen
Louis Kampf
Allison Kilkenny
Jamie Kilstein
Joel Kovel
Mark Kurlansky
Michael Lerner
David Lindorff
Peter Linebaugh
Scott McLarty
Cynthia McKinney
Mark Crispen Miller
Dede Miller
Russell Mokhiber
George Monbiot
Roger Morris
Bobby Muller
Christian Parenti
Michael Perelman
Peter Phillips
Francis Fox Piven
Louis Proyect
Ted Rall
Cindy Sheehan
Michael J. Smith
Chris Spannos
Paul Street
Sunil Sharma
Stephen Pearcy
Jeffrey St. Clair
Immanuel Wallerstein
Len Weinglass
Cornel West
Sherry Wolf
Michael Yates
Mickey Z
Kevin Zeese

Please sign the Open Letter to the Left Establishment.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

How To Detect A "Friend Of Black People"

From the Booker Rising Blog:


As I told a client of mine yesterday: "DEFINE WHAT YOUR REQUIREMENTS ARE AND THE RIGHT SOLUTION WILL SHOW ITS FACE".

I challenge Black America (and the publisher of 'Obama & Michelle Politics') to apply the same mental rigor to identify the FRIENDS OF BLACK PEOPLE.

* A friend of BLACK PEOPLE would use his influence over the people running the SCHOOLS that Black people attend (and Black parents who he has favor with) to force ALL OF THEM to change their ways so that the BLACK KIDS can have a quality education. IF the people running the public schools don't want to CHANGE then allow the KIDS to exit these quarters, assisting them in finding a more QUALITY education source

* A friend of BLACK PEOPLE would see that when CRACK came about MORE BLACK PEOPLE WERE MURDERED in the streets. INSTEAD OF to-damned-day REFERENCING these PAST homicide rates and comparing them to TODAY as your PERVERTED PROOF of "advancement" (cough cough BET Uncut) you will instead listen out to those who claim that CRACK was sold by BLACKS because of a particular PRESIDENT'S policies and then you listen to these same people who say that the INCARCERATION over CRACK is destroying the Black community TODAY - and you need to make sure that THESE PEOPLE NEVER HAVE POWER OVER YOUR COMMUNITY - because they show IN BOTH DAMNED CASES - that EXTERNAL IDEOLOGY AND POLICIES drive the results in the Black community more than THOSE WHO NOW HAVE ELECTIVE OFFICES and more importantly STRONG INFLUENCE over the CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE PEOPLE

* You get in your car and you drive around to MISSION ACCOMPLISHED CITIES where BLACK PEOPLE have voted THEIR FRIENDS IN TO OFFICE. Don't look at the PORTAITS ON THE WALL. Look at the pictures that have EGGS AND TOMATOES thrown upon them. THIS represents those who COULD NOT GET ELECTED AS "DOG CATCHER" in these towns. Make note because THEY HAVE NO POWER in these places. Go around town and watch the PEOPLE from the aspect of a "Time and Motion" study. ARE THEY PRODUCTIVE? Has the EDUCATION that they received at the hands of FAVORABLE PEOPLE given them the wherewithal to work toward their own SALVATION? OR are they convinced that they are ONE ELECTION AWAY from helping their ideology to FEED THEM top shelf soup?

IN SUMMARY - A FRIEND OF BLACK PEOPLE would help us to BECOME ORGANICALLY COMPETENT amongst ourselves.

An ENEMY of Black Consciousness finds the Last Senator Ted Kennedy labeling of them as THE LEAST OF THESE comforting to them.

One should not be surprised to see that they have no UN-LEAST OF THESE development plans for the masses.

Saturday, January 15, 2011

RT - More Important Than Ever To Watch International News

RT - Russian Television - is an English news broadcast from the nation of Russia.

It is an Al Jezeera type service, the goal of providing a perspective on the news that is outside of the scope and bias of the American news juggernaut.

Thanks to my Roku box I am able to watch:

  • RT
  • Al Jezeera
  • France 24
  • ANI (Asian News International) 
on a daily basis.

RT has become more important to me than "Al Jezeera" English because it is the voice of a more obvious adversary to the USA.  Each day they embed a blatantly critical report of the conditions of life, economics or "social justice" in the United States.   I have no problem with this inclusion.  I am merely observant of how much they go out of their way to find these points.   When it comes to the "context" of this information I determine the proportion of this news by balancing my knowledge of these points as an insider to this nation coupled with my consumption of "opposition news" inside of the USA - (ex: "Democracy Now").

I noticed that during an interview on RT - a professor from "American University" enumerated two forces in Tunisia - the "Right-Wing" establishment and then the "Democracy Movement".   This follows my observations earlier from "Democracy Now" in which Dr Francis Fox Pivens labeled America's political forces as the "Right-wing" and the "Democratic Party".   (She labeled herself as a Democrat).    

I figured that a transparent person would have labeled them as "right-wing" and "left-wing".   Instead they show their lack of transparency in that their own standing is considered the rational baseline position.  Their "right" adversaries are labeled as "right wing".   One is forced to note the rare references to "left-wing" on these opposition broadcasts.

The Start Treaty

During the "Lame Duck Congress" back in December when the START treaty was being negotiated I was made to agree that the Republicans were being overly obstructionist in their desire to seek a delay in the ratification.   The main reason why I felt this way and why I ultimately supported this treaty was because the fears that the treaty would prohibit construction of a US based ANTI-Missile or "Missile Defense" system would not be abridged.   Since we were told that credible military sources said this was not the case - I could not see any justifiable reasons to oppose the treaty.

Fast forward to RT today.   The Russian parliament - a body with absolutely no diversity (all old White males) is now debating the terms of START.   What is there main concern?    That the USA will "cheat" on the treaty by........................CONSTRUCTING A "MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM"!!!!!!   They fear that if the USA is wearing a "bullet proof vest" (my words) that their choice to reduce their number of bullets to shot through the vest will incapacitate their weapons load, requiring them to need more.  Why then reduce?

The English speaking Russian reporter from the parliament said that they are not so focused on the Obama Administration's commitment to hold the line on "Missile Defense" - they are looking as SUBSEQUENT ADMINISTRATIONS who might build it up.

Wait a minute.     As it stands right now I believe that the American public was LIED TO.  
In a quest to achieve a "victory" in support of this treaty the vital sticking point on Missile Defense was SPUN.  It is no surprise that the American Left has generally opposed the larger "Strategic Defense Initiative" or "Star Wars" from the start.  The smaller version called "missile defense" has been panned and attacked by Keith Olbermann, while others have said that it all is a waste of money.  Each time the US military and military contractor release a video of a successful termination of a missile in flight during a test we see a counter-report from an activist group of scientists showing how the simulation was incredible, lacking real world authenticity.  

After listening to the Russian reporter relay the sentiment from the legislators in Russia I am now made to key an eye on this entire exchange and question more of what we are told as American consumers of news from the government.   If talk about the Missile Defense System in Europe slowly fades away we will know that the talking points around START is responsible. 

Recall that the hostilities a few years ago between Russia and the country of Georgia was related to Georgia which borders Russia, becoming too close to the USA and NATO.   

I will commit to doing more research on this one.  The likely source of the missiles to be defended against is Russia.  Yet NATO - which was primarily created to defend against the former USSR has, for the first time in its history, invited the Russian leader to its meeting in order to negotiate with him on Missile Defense.  They are working out points of negotiation about the "flack jacket" that they want to construct in case the man they invited to the meeting starts shooting at them?  Something does not smell right.



From Nov 2010
Mr. Medvedev was invited to the NATO summit meeting Friday night, a major change from two years ago, when Mr. Putin crashed the NATO dinner in Bucharest, Romania, to lecture Mr. Bush about the dangers of NATO expansion to Georgia and Ukraine.

Russian and Georgia fought a small war later that year, and Russian troops still occupy two provinces of Georgia, Abkhazia and South Ossetia. NATO officials contend that a closer relationship with Moscow is the best way to make progress on Georgia.

Thursday, January 13, 2011

The Self-Rationalizations Of "Diversity.com"

For a web site that transacts in "Black Inferiority" as a means of obtaining a favorable end using ideological pleasing methodologies I wonder if Diversity.com is aware that it used its POWER to make whatever rules that it desires on the use of racial identifiers?

When Diversity.com grows to the point that it doesn't care what another self-contained media operation does only then can we conclude that their consciousness has reached parity.

Trust me when I say that this policy does not disturb me in the least.  I happen to capitalize both "Black" and "White".   I am far more disturbed by the overall progressive-fundamentalist agenda of Diversity.com that with this editorial policy which will never draw a crowd of protesters demanding that they change

The diversity that they seek is in:
  • Race
  • Gender
  • Age 
  • Sexual Preference
  • Gender Identification  
  • Religious tolerance.
all done under ideological homogeneity.  Or should I "Ask The White Guy" to tell me otherwise?

Question:

Could you explain why the "b" in "black Americans" is not capitalized? I've noticed that other ethnic groups all are capitalized. But not Black people. Why is this?

Answer:

Most mainstream print publications in the United States use what is known as "AP style," or the style dictated by The Associated Press Stylebook. This book and web site describes what to capitalize and what not to capitalize (among other rules of grammar).

To find companies that value Black employees, read The 2009 DiversityInc Top 10 Companies for African Americans List. You can also search for jobs on DiversityInc.com's Career Center from companies on that list: AT&T, Target and Altria.

I made the decision not to follow AP style in the case of "Black" and "white" when it applies to describing people. AP style is to capitalize neither; however, terms such as African American, Negro, Caucasian, Italian American or Asian are all capitalized.

Regardless of whether there is adequate representation among the decision makers at the AP, I felt DiversityInc needed to be more accurate.

The word "Black" is used around the world to describe people who have "racial" features indicating African ancestry. Please keep in mind that the convention of race has been discarded by science--genetically, we are all one race, and the human-genome project proves we are all from Africa.

"Black" is also accepted by many Black people as an inoffensive description. It is a generalized description and can be supplemented by another description such as Black Canadian, Black African American, Nigerian American or Black Latino. However, many Black people describe themselves simply as being "Black," and this reality is reflected in a body of literature, music and academic study.

I do not believe "white" needs to be capitalized because people in the white majority don't think of themselves in that way. I don't think there's anything wrong with this--it's just how it is. The exception is white supremacists who have a definite vision for what "white" means. Most American white people describe themselves in more defined terms, such as Irish American or Jewish. I will make the point that African Americans (descendents of slaves) cannot define themselves more accurately than an entire continent because their ancestry was obliterated by the practices of enslavers, which included breaking apart tribal and family bonds.

I don't think there will ever be a time in our country where "white" becomes "White." Nor do I think white people will accept the term "minority" when we become less than 50 percent of our population by roughly 2045. I think that's a good thing--people should be allowed to describe themselves, not have descriptions forced on them. I also think that the term "minority" is a pejorative and has no place in describing people.

Our capitalization of "Black" is both a reflection of reality and of respect. Opinions will differ on this, but as long as I make the decisions on editorial policy and content at DiversityInc, this is how this publication will write "Black" and "white."

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

"Fight The Power Radio" Caller: When I Looked Into Sara Palin's Eyes I Saw Coldness And Unrepentedness

Sarah Palin: "America's Enduring Strength" from Sarah Palin on Vimeo.


You have to understand these people.

They are strong supporters of the innocence of Mumia "Killa Mu" Jamal and his mentor Troy Davis.
Yet they can't hold themselves as they make the logical leap that Sara Palin gave the crazed killer in Arizona the gun.

Why should you be "repentant" against an act that you had nothing to do with? In fact how is it that these experts of guilt and innocence distinguish themselves from the long line of RACISTS who sought to lock up or string up Black people on evidence no more than their CONSENSUS?

The corrupt use "their demands for justice as an INDICTMENT against their enemies" and "use the assignment of temperance and judiciousness as a WEAPON to slay them".
In both cases they don't deserve to receive what they are not willing to give.

The ONLY think that they can say about the INJUSTICE that they receive is that is is ONLY the case that they are not IN POWER to render the same dosage against their enemy.

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Chauncey and Brother X Squared Have Another Session


I actually like my friend Chauncey of "We Are Respectable Negroes".

I just can't bear to listen as he has his monthly S&A sessions with Brother X Squared.   The sight of a grown man fully submitting himself to another is quite distressing.

You see - IF I remain silent about what I am seeing then I am a worthy candidate to become a "Real Blackman".  If I dare speak out about what I see then I become a "corporate Negro", forever stripped of my ability to join the club and fight their eternal fight.




The highlights of their conversation.






X:  I have so much to teach you Brother Chauncey. I have not spoken to you in a month and already you are on some foolishness. Just when I think you have gained knowledge, you, just like all the other so-called "respectable" negroes in this country, go back to acting like the white man's playthings.

Constructive Feedback Analysis:  Sounds like a Superior and a "Lil Fella" relationship to me.  Though they likely converse over the Internet or at least using Chauncey's VoIP telephone service I get the picture that Chauncey assumes the position - seated and waiting to take notes prior to every conversation with X.

X: Hurt. Hurt as in our ancestors' backs from the devilish whips and whirling dervishes of the white man's lances and rods? 
 Constructive Feedback Analysis:  I just watched "The Empire Of Africa" over the weekend.  This detailed the carnage in Sierra Leone in the early part of the past decade.  These cats used AK47's and sticks to beat their own kind.  The Black Africans of today who survive the blood bath will be someone's ANCESTORS of the future

Chauncey: Quite frankly, I am shocked. I have never seen you in such a mood. I will politely try again.

Constructive Feedback Analysis:  Definately not the words that an "Alpha Dog" in a relationship would say.


X: As I have predicted, the black man is worse off this year than he has been ever. He is more likely to be poor. He is more likely to be wasting his money on nonsense in the service of the white man's economy
Constructive Feedback Analysis:  I assure Brother X that Chauncey and the merry men that post on his blog have a flurry of pro-Obama opinion surveys from Black folks that confound this claim made by X.  Its a good thing that Glenn Beck did not say such a thing.  Chauncey would have whipped the stats out.
Chauncey: Okay, what are your thoughts on the upcoming year, specific thoughts on the President, the Tea-Party GOP takeover, and the general state of the Union?
 Constructive Feedback Analysis:  When  all else fails - OBFUSCATE toward the Republicans and the GOP in order to have the conversation that you really want.  Who cares about the condition of Black people if there are no Republicans to blame for it anyway?

X: He let a half-rican into the White House just to bring the temple down on Obama's head. I laugh and mock you all. Educated true Nubians such as Brother X-Squared and his legions saw the con a long way off.
 Constructive Feedback Analysis:   If "the White man LET Obama into the White House"......about 96% of the Negro voters AGREED with "Whitey".  Maybe Brother X has a "recalibration camp" to seen the majority of Blacks in the nation to in order to set them straight?

X: The Constitution is a bigoted, racist document that supported slavery. Those White devils are loading the guns and loading them in your faces and you passive American born neo-slaves sit and get ready to take the blast.
Constructive Feedback Analysis:   The only reason why Brother X has not been lynched after having Fox News incessantly repeating his claim about "Killing White babies" is because TO-DAMNED-DAY the justice system in America does a better job in protecting the First Amendment.

X: I can appreciate your sentiment that white racism and racial resentment drives the Republicans and the New Right. In fact, I have written about that myself many times.
There were black overseers during slavery. The black man who held the whip was worse than the white slave master! Those boot-licking Tom Negroes and Handkerchief head Aunt Jemima types like that hellish Oprah Winfrey who was given an award by the Kennedy Center!

 Constructive Feedback Analysis: Again Chauncey threw out a bone in the form of West and Scott.  I struggle to understand why there is such hyperbolic focus on TWO BLACKS in the US House while the other 44 Blacks who are in the "correct party" receive little coverage.  I wonder if Rep Carson (D-IN) has any particular grievance that Scott and West has received far, far, far more press coverage as they have just been sworn in for less than a week.  Carson has been around for at least 4 years and has not been mentioned as much as West in 6 months.


.X: Those Black Conservatives are cowards and traitors, but at least they are pragmatic. Here is how there sickness is so so deep and the White man's game so strong.
Constructive Feedback Analysis:   I get the feeling that If Brother X and Chauncey had their own nation and were both in control over free speech that a person like me would have his throat slit for speaking out of turn.

How can one be a TRAITOR to a movement that IS NOT "BLACK"?  It is LEFTIST RADICAL PROGRESSIVE.  Ensnaring a sufficient among of aggrieved Blacks is merely the mission.

X: those Michael Steele's and Allen West's, they get no greater pleasure than being cuckolded by the White Man. It brings them joy.
Constructive Feedback Analysis:  I get the feeling that if Comcast/AT&T/Verizon/Time Warner or Cox Cable were to cut Brother X's Internet access that he would be pissed at "the White man".

Another Black Radical Nationalist......with a MySpace page.
The Revolution will not be televised.  It will appear on YouTube.

Eugene Robinson Is No Fan Of "Hip Hop Voice Of The Street Pirates"



If you ever want to know why there is a blanket of silence over the steady trickle of blood that transpires on the cement sidewalks of the "Mission Accomplished" cities where the Progressive-Fundamentalists have won the battle it is because their voices know the corollary to the public arguments that they proudly make.

If "Hip Hop Music" is accepted as the political voice of the streets as it is often cast by Russell Simmons and others then Eugine Robinson's jaundiced view is notably shortsighted.

Saturday, January 8, 2011

The "Democratic Preacher" Al Sharpton And Dr Boyce Watkins Plot 'Black Strategy' Through The Democratic Party



The term that I have coined called "Keep Your Enemies On Trial So You Never Are Forced To Substantiate The Impact Of Your Friends" nearly universally describes the antics of the Black Quasi-Socialist Progressive-Fundamentalist Racism Chaser. They are better thought of as 'Progressives who are Democrats who are Black'.

Right out of the box "The Democratic Preacher" Al Sharpton frames the debate about unemployment in the Black community upon the "hostage taking" by the GOP.

Does anyone believe that there will come a point in time where the Black rank & file, making note of who has dominate control over all of their institutions - rejects this framing and makes note of how the establisment machine that they have entrusted has not corrected their unemployment rate to a point that is closer to their long time adversaries? This being done by COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT within?

Sadly there is no point at which the fortunes of our community reach the point where there is a trial for the people who control it.

Friday, January 7, 2011

OK You Have Convinced Me - The Repeal Of Health Care Will Cost Money

CBO: Health care repeal would increase deficit

While I think that the GOP is full of hot air in its symbolic attempt to repeal "Health INSURANCE Regulation" it is quite interesting to uncover the implict bias of certain news operations.

Those which make note that the Congressional Budget Office predicts that a repeal would trigger a deficit yet purposefully withhold the information that this translates into a whopping $230 billion.....................over 10 years are clearly biased.

We have just concluded 2 years with a budget deficit of over $1,200 each year.  What is $23 billion over 10 years?

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Defenders Online - Added to My Surveillance

The Defenders On Line

It is quite interesting that in the "Criminal Justice" page of this blog there are more discussions about the "New Orleans Police Department" than there are about "Street Pirates".

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Confounding My Friend BET Uncut On "Street Pirate On Black" Crime

My friend BET Uncut (BTX3 ) has been steady in his attempts to undercut my keen focus upon the establishment machine that dominates the Black community and my particular emphasis on the assaults that our people are suffering on their watch.  With the fact that these assaults are mostly generated by individuals who have matriculated through the system that these "favorable people" have monopoly domination over makes my claims that much more troubling to BET Uncut and others who think like him.

Instead of taking a step back from his own ideological and partisan entrenchment and consider that "Safe Streets" are an agreeable attribute for all - he sees my focus as a threat which might cause him and others to "put their ideology on trial".

His response has been to fire shots at ME and my motivations.

The False Target Of Zero Crime

 The most consistent indictment that he has used over time is to undercut my claims of rampant crime by making the case that my dreams of "zero crime" on the watch of this machine is unrealistic.  Others on his "Neo-All White Jury" team have pointed to the genocidal rates of murder during the 1970s and 1980s and point out that TODAY'S rates are a mere fraction thus we have made "progress".

They fail to note that while these past rates where "totally damned unacceptable" that today's rates have been elevated to "damned unacceptable".   Though reduced they still out-pace the homicide and assault rates of other communities.

Chicago Touts That It "Only" Had 435 Murders In 2010 - Lowest Since 1965

I have never heard a Civil Rights Era leader say "We ONLY had 50% of the lynchings of Black people than we did last year.  This was thanks to our efforts to work with the KKK/CCC and others who are killing us to get them to respect our people".

The Indictment

 This brings me to the primary means of scrutiny of the Black Quasi-Socialist Progressive-Fundamentalist Racism Chaser.  

A few weeks ago a Black man in Mississippi was found hanging from a tree.  Despite the fact that nearby Jackson Mississippi had a double digit murder count for the year - the sight of a hanged Black man in a "White neighborhood" was a more interesting sight.  The picture made its way to many "Black-wing" press sites.


 My point is that if "ZERO" is an unrealistic point to which BET Uncut holds me to - WHY is it that he does not accuse his fellow Progressive-Fundamentalists of sensationalizing the death of one Black man, having drove past the police tape of so many others in the process?

Do not get me wrong - I want ALL MURDERS treated as an outrage.  I ask that NO ONE "shut up".  I am asking for more!

When the pattern of outrage is too predictable and selective - this needs to be called out.

Monday, January 3, 2011

The Corrupt Press And The Corrupt Black Blogger Sycophants That Syndicate The Corruption

I was just asking someone how they figured those who convinced themselves with the talking point that "Obama has created more jobs in 2 years than Bush had created in 8 years" were doing as they stood in the unemployment line with this point of motivation by slight of hand.

Today I was going through my list of "blogger friends" that line the right side of this blog and came across an article from my friend over at "King Politics".


Pop The Cork? The Biggest Deficit Reduction In U.S. History Occurred From 2009 to 2010

I no longer get mad any longer.  I merely try and keep myself away from their ability to control my life.
I don't cry at what I see as people base intellectual dishonesty and "masturbatory" rhetoric that they use in their circle to keep them focused and not depressed despite the travail around them.

I have resolved to seek as much information as I can through enough information sources and then use my God given intelligence to interpolate the TRUTH.

The first thing that I noticed in this dishonest article is that the author had no intention of telling us that the REDUCTION came between two years - 2009 which was the greatest DEFICIT in US History and 2010 (approx $1,300 billion)  which was the SECOND greatest (approx $1,200 billion in the red).

You would think that a person who is prepared to syndicate this message would see it, note the lack of credibility of the information and agree to never propagate any messages from that particular blog again.  This only takes place when the syndicator's agenda is TRANSPARENT.

From The Capital Gains and Games blog

In previous years we would have been breaking out the champagne on this news: The monthly budget review released yesterday by the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the federal budget deficit fell by $125 billion from 2009 to 2010. This by far is the biggest one-year nominal drop in the deficit that has ever occurred.

There were two primary reasons there was no cheering yesterday.

First, it's not at all clear that reducing the deficit was the correct fiscal policy given the slow growth in the U.S. economy.

Second, in the current political atmosphere even a 50 percent reduction would have still left lots of room for those who want to do so to use the deficit as an issue. To those folks, the $125 billion reduction simply isn't as important as the $1.29 trillion deficit that's available for campaign fodder.

In other words, the $125 billion reduction in the deficit was both too much and not enough.

A quick word of caution. The CBO numbers are estimates; the official final number, which will be released later this month by the Treasury, is likely to be a little different. My back-of-the-envelope guess is that it will be a bit lower.

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Black Athletes Who Have Been "Shot Down Like Dogs" But Which (Alleged) Sports Columnist Dave Zirin Has Failed To Report On

On Dimples and Dog Whistles: Why Tucker Carlson Dehumanizes Michael Vick 

Aside from (alleged) technology commentator Mario Armstrong who appears on XM "The Power"  - I have never seen a specialty media personality fuse this ideological bigotry into his (alleged) area of expertise as much as David Zirin.   The fact that "The Nation" has a sports column says everything that one needs to know about the contamination that  Mr Zirin brings to his sports analysis.

The man who revealed in his C-SPAN book review that he opposed the sale of the Texas Rangers to former MLB great Nolan Ryan for no other reason than Ryan's "right wing politics" shows how committed to focusing upon what goes on on the field of play.  :-/

So it comes as no surprise that Mr Zirin has provided yet another fusion between "the sport of politics" and "the politics of sports" in which he castigates Tucker Carson for suggesting (rather bone-headly) that Michael Vick should have been executed for his past treatment of dogs.

We must understand how "Rachael Maddow Style Reporting" works.  You see the goal is to keep indictments of one's enemies flowing.  It matters not that the points of focus are IRRELEVANT in the big scheme of things.  The point is that while the masses are united in their indictment against their enemies - few will notice what Maddow/Zirin are NOT talking about which is of major consequence.

Last month three Black football players from the University of Southern Mississippi were shot down LIKE DOGS.   If we enumerate the characteristics that make this a FAVORABLE target for Mr Zirin to cover for the purposes of his indictment they would be:

  • MISSISSIPPI (God Damn)
  • 3 Black Men
  • SHOT!!!!!  (There were no ropes conveniently nearby)
Oh wait.  Darn it.  This did not happen at a "CCC Sponsored" off campus party.  It appears to be yet another example of "urban violence" that happened in the rural area of Hattiesburg MS.

I am transparent enough to not blame Mr Zirin or Ms Maddow for their failure to cover this issue as if THEY were to blame for the shooting.   Simply put, however, just as they seek to develop PATTERNS of overt attacks inspired by "right-wing" forces, giving voice to the pattern so people can be on the look out - their own antics show their guilt in AVOIDING talking about issues that would cause them to INDICT their friends - the VICTIMIZED Blacks who have, perish the thought - committed some ORGANIC assaults that there are no RIGHT WING conspiracies to affix to.

Black Athletes Who Were "Euthanized" In 2010 But Did Not Trigger A Column By David Zirin Because The Assailant Was Not Interesting To His Ideological Agenda


  1. Former Atlanta Hawk Lorenzo Wright's Body Found In Memphis TN
  2.  Former Basketball Star  (and Present Hawk's Executive) Nick Van Exel's Son Charged With Murder
  3. UConn Football Player Killed In Campus Stabbing 
  4. Star High School Football Player In Georgia Killed At His Home 
  5.  
  6.  
  7.  
It appears that the WORDS of a conservative enemy are more powerful than the actual deadly attacks done by a "non-interesting target".
The truth is that Mr Zirin has a better chance of losing his occasional seat in the "Barbershop" by public protest IF he doggedly fixated on the convergence of Sports, Violence, Womanizing and "Black Capitalistic Excesses".  Many in Mr Zirin's audience would rather that Mr Zirin talk about their common ideological adversaries rather than key in upon that which is causing more material harm.  This allows them to continue on with their tenuous coalition.


To be honest I learned about Mr Zirin's column after peeking into my friend Filled-Negro's blog.  As co-founder of the "Afro-Spear" group he is committed to the enhancement of freedom for Black people - which will be arrived at by operating as "Media Matters In Black Face".  (Oh I forgot - Media Matters does have Oliver Willis as a paid staff member - making money for what Filled Negro does for free).

The long story short about all of them (Zirin, Maddow, Filled-Negro and Willis) is that absent their focus on their ideological adversary there is not much there for them to work with.