Sunday, November 28, 2010

Beware Of The "Whites Only" Sign That Is Dangled In Front Of You, Its Chain Rattles To Elicit Fear Within You

From The "We Are Respectable Negroes" blog

A Focus On Defensive End Sarah Palin And Her Attack On Kickoff Returner Michelle Obama In The "Malcolm X Political Football Game"

My second reply
My Friend Chauncey:


I have since read Richard Cohen's article and your piece and the other posts on this platform for public intelectual discourse.

Having watched a documentary on former DC mayor Marion Berry last night I now have an even greater perception of where you, Cohen and Tim Wise reside with respect to the clear and present circumstances of the American Negro.

You see for Cohen the "Whites Only" sign that he saw in Washington DC as a child is a more powerful indictment which explains the "INFERIOR" standing of the American Black today - economically, academically, and tactically than is the evidence that "colored men" in the seats of power today offer as evidence that things have changed.

Big picture-wise Chauncey - when I see those black and white 8mm video tapes of the signs and the brutal White cops from back in the day instead of using that as my world reference for today I choose to look at the present images that are show in color, high definition having been transmitted from the reporters remote camera via microwave, too often from the crime scene in the 8th Ward. This section represented by Berry is a mere 8 miles from the White House.

With a favorable police chief that was appointed by the 6th (or so) Black mayor in control of the city - we can safely say that the SEATS OF POWER who ENFORCED the laws and the WORLD VIEW that the "Whites Only Signs" signified - are now BLACK AMERICANS!!!!

You, like Cohen need to ask yourself Chauncey - WHY are these images of the PAST so POWERFUL to you to-damned-day that they cause your conscious mind to gloss over that which the PRESENT people in power erect upon your people, channeling them down a certain course to continued incompetence and inferiority per the lack of material proof that their PROGRESS is nigh?

If this is a key reference in time that Sarah Palin wants to TAKE US BACK TO if she ever gets seated in the house 2 miles from 8th Ward ........why isn't there more inspection by you of those operatives who support and DEFEND the present power establishment over these communities who TAUNT THE NEGRO with black and white images to engender FEAR of what their disposal from power my bring forth yet have FAILED to leverage their power to build up organic competencies within these communities that now have the "Whites Only" signs removed from them?


My First Reply - The Administrator had not initially approved it. I record it here as a means of protecting my own ideas from the delete key of another.

My friend Chauncey:

I did not read your post here.
I did not read Cohen's article.

Instead I registered another tick mark in my count of "Progressives who are Democrats who are Black" blogs that are generating content about SARAH PALIN.

You see, Chauncey when the great Malcolm X warned us about "The Political Football Game between White Conservative and White Progressive" he was warning conscious Black people about the perils of taking up the cause NOT OF YOUR OWN but which is solely within the domain of AMERICAN POLITICS.

You see Chauncey the one thing that I have a skill for is "pattern matching". Instead of remaining at the TRANSACTIONAL level, eating up the "self-chum" that is propagated by certain Progressive-Fundamentalists to keep me "Ideologically Unified" and within a "racial siege mentality" I instead make note of a pattern.

At a time when the Black community's key institutions are controlled by "Respectable Favorable Negroes" and "White Progressive Snarling Foxes" that meet the popular approval - there is more content on the "Progressives that are Black" blogs that focus upon ideological adversaries like Palin, Beck, Limbaugh, Steele and Clarence Thomas than there is transparent and critical appraisal about the people who are actually in the seats of power over these key institutions.

Malcolm X in his wisdom realize the POWER that the obfuscation that is so readily apparent has, to the negation of the interests of the Black community.

Sarah Palin IS NOT A THREAT TO "THE BLACK COMMUNITY". She is ONLY a threat to Democrats and Progressive policies. It is ONLY the fact that the Black community has fused these two methodologies as "Certified Black" that Palin is problematic.

Tell me Chauncey - in response to the report about Black male academic performance - what did you write?

You posted Moynehan's words and a reference to 72% of OOWB. The Sarah Palin post showed more passion from you than did the peril surrounding our young brothers.

It all comes down to two things brother Chauncey:

1) PRIORITIZATION
2) FOCUS

Failing to implement BOTH in equal measure as you show yourself to be a SCIENTIST in support of mitigating the problems in our community - Sarah Palin from Alaska gets promoted as a grand threat to you and others.

The BIGGEST threat to Black people per my view is the BENIGN NEGLECT that takes place as otherwise good brothers like you get distracted with other non-priority issues.

Pull up brother. We have bigger fish to fry

Saturday, November 27, 2010

The Malcolm-Che Blog Against The Prison Industrial Complex

Malcolm Che Blog


I wonder if the blog owner realizes that Che Guevara had many war prisoners and political prisoners detained in Cuba and was accused of having some of them killed?

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Scanning The HuffPo Comments Section

In the HuffPo article "Is Black Political Power Under Siege" I did something that I don't ever recall doing before: Read the comments section.

A few years ago I called out HuffPo educational activist Dan Brown for his exodus of a "Black school" which he called a "jungle" only to later write a book about his experience. He saw my blog and asked me to come over to HuffPo to debate his. I REFUSED. I will never create an account on HuffPo - the key vehicle that propagates the unconsciousness that is abundant in the political discourse within my community.

As I read many of the comments which tell about the quest that Black people are upon for equal treatment and quality education I am stunned by the viewpoints of the posters.  Simply put - there is no amount of control that the Progressives will ever obtain over the institutions that SHOULD BE delivering these promised benefits for the Progressive-Fundamentalists to begin to look at their own failures to deliver instead of chasing after conservative-bigots.

Select snippets of posts from "Black HuffPo Co-conspirators":

dudecrush:

It is not a simple issue of economics. What you are doing is trying to whittle it down to a welfare issue which is the pervasive myth that has existed since the 70's and beyond. Black people vote lockstep with the Democratic party because they are the only ones willing to address the myriad social issues that affect us. For example, the readjusting of the cocaine sentencing guidelines, police brutality, community development, education, hate crimes etc.
If the Republican party was not so hostile to minorities perhaps more of us would join, but they continually spout vitriol that attacks us as a community. I live in Georgia where our newly elected Republican Governor was quoted as making references to "ghetto grandma's" and proudly proclaimed voting against the voting rights act.
"Blacks" have pondered the cost of our political role and we find it to be much more beneficial than the alternative. And for the record not all black people are welfare babies as you are insinuating. Maybe if you NOT so rich Republican "Whites" pondered the true cost of the political role you play you would vote with us before you end up on the same welfare you accuse us of receiving because of your dedication to your racism. If you make less than 250K a year your precious Republicans DO NOT CARE about you regardless of color and they will make you poor before they are finished.


OnestopHipHopFrazier
How condescending. We, the Blacks, should ignore our collective experiences and listen to you, and all of our problems will be solved. Of course! You know, before the Civil Rights era, black people voted Republican, because they were the party of Abe Lincoln and the Radical Republicans that fought, died, and were even lynched alongside my forefathers in an effort to attain equality. What changed? The introduction of 'The Southern Strategy', the flight of Dixie-crats to the Republican Party in response to LBJ signing civil rights legislation. You conservatives always link minorities with welfare, poverty, and drug abuse, yet whites dominate those categories in reality. No one wants a handout, you jackasses, just a fair shot at the American Dream. What we need in the Black community is for public education to be fair across the board, not being funded by local property taxes. That alone traps people from certain areas, let's say 'ghettos', into perpetual poverty, because our children go to substandard schools, while affluent kids go to excellent, well-funded schools. Why not fund public schools exactly alike, and if rich parents want more for their kids school, so be it. We just want a fair shake, which is, fundamentally, the 'American Way'. The conservative response? Kill the Dept. of Ed. Really? Who does that help? Why would anyone from our community vote for that? BTW, what, exactly, is wrong with ACORN? Like, what did they do that was illegal? I'll wait!


I assure you that for both dudecrush and OnestopHipHopFrazier there is no telling them how misdirected they are. They are the perfect archetypes of "Permanent Chasers".

They both talk about the quest by Black America for "Quality Education". If you notice - neither one of them are inclined to talk about the success of the "Struggle" in procuring control over the educational systems that are today failing to provide quality services to our people. One stop goes on to make quality education a function of EQUAL PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FUNDING. With the previous goal of "putting people into place that love Black children and care about our community" having been obtained - they now have a new target. Again if you believe that someone from this crowd of Black Progressives are going to stand up and say "Wait a cotton picking minute!!! I followed loyally in support of the goal to take over the schools. Why don't you prove to me that our education benefited from this previous goal before I continue to follow you through the next interval?".

The reason why we are not going to hear such a notation is because "Progressivism Is In-Organic.

By scaling up their indictment against the "unequal funding" of the public schools the progressive-fundamentalist sets up a new phase of permanent struggle. They want the strong hand of the central government to be the distribution agent for schools nationally.

If and when their enemies exit public schools and choose to fund their own private schools at a desired rate - rest assure that OneStop will ratchet up his struggle - demanding that all public schools receive funding commensurate to the private schools, stripping away their advantage.

If you believe that this is ever going to stop from their own initiative - you are sadly mistaken.

This indictment IS the substance of their political ideology and associated motion.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

We Are Progressive-Fundamentalist Negroes - Who Live Vicariously Through Obama

We Are Respectable Negroes blog: They Are So Old School: Hiram Maxim, The Echoes Of History and the Bigotry of the New Right in the Age Of Obama

QUESTION;  Why do Black people need to STAY UNIFIED (as long as it is BEHIND OBAMA) and not be tricked into criticizing him?

ANSWER:  Because the people who are attacking him already are RACISTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We must understand the argument made by the "Progressives who are Democrats".  
YES THERE ARE RACISTS WHO HATE OBAMA.   This will ALWAYS be the case.

Those who seek to advance their Progressive/Democratic agenda without challenge hope that you will overemphasize the force of RACISM in relation to the other legitimate points of criticism of President Obama.  If they can enlist you in the fight against RACISM you won't bother to focus on the legitimate points of criticism.   And no not just the ones where he has not been as LEFTIST as you desire.  I am speaking of absolute measures of effectiveness.

You see - I have noted before that PROGRESSIVISM IS INORGANIC.
As such they claim that their "Racism" shown in the 96% vote for Obama and the 91% present support for Obama by Black Americans is in RESPONSE TO the ORGANIC RACISM had by the White Right-wing.   In effect they don't have any "organic racism".  Their "racialism" is a necessary rebuttal to the real RACISM that is suffered from their enemies.

Chauncy DeVega needs to have us focused on "racism chasing".  IF we Black people slip up and begin to question why the decades of support and the placement of "favorable people" into power the conditions in so many of our communities are as such then people like DeVega are forced into introspection of their own beliefs and the point of COMPLICITY that they have in erecting the present governance regime in Black America.   It is thus vitally important that they maintain a siege mentality, protecting the Progressives.  Protecting Obama.

Why is it that their actions done under the cover of race are not considered in the same light as their ideological enemies?

The fraud that they execute is intended to shift the inspection made by the Black community away from the competencies of the leadership that we as a community have hoisted upon our institutions, over to an indictment of the broader society - the ubiquitous and amorphous RACISTS in particular.

From The "We Are Respectable Negroes" blog

Mr DeVega:

Can you set up a scenario by which

1) A US President DOES NOT have a loyal opposition for no other reason than his ideological and partisan differences?

2) A BLACK President's opposition IS NOT called RACIST by you? (This Black President being favorable to YOU not withstanding)

The best thing that you can say is that "I have never had a President that I was so attached to AND thus the attacks against him are felt more PERSONALLY by me". The claims of "No other recent president has been attacked as much as Obama has is pure B.S. ". Second only to the Anti-War activities, Obama's term being adjacent to Bush's also provides a point of reference about the DEMAND "respect for the office" has also changed.

I do credit you Mr DeVega. You are far more articulate than many of the other Left-Wing Fundamentalist/ Racism Chasing blogs. Though you both end up in the same position, your narrative course is far more enticing.

Here is what I have learned after careful study of you and others:

You need to keep your enemies on trial as an indictment for the present condition of Black people so that you can avoid the painful truth that a transparent inspection of the PEOPLE AND POLICIES that you have hoisted into power with the auspices of "Helping The Black Community". Despite their growth in POWER over the key institutions of our communities - they avoid your condemnation. Their failures to deliver MUST be due to the White Conservative attempts to up end them. No where in your mind might this be due to failed theories that they possess.

Talk to us about the state of Education for Black people Chauncey - the systems that FAVORABLE PEOPLE to you have been running for about 30 years. What about the economic development in these same communities? The public safety?

Strip away the focus on the "White Right Wing" and you are left naked, having to ponder an inspection of what you have fielded as a solution.

For you "RACISM" is seen in the White voters in AL and MS voting for John McCain to the tune of 89% and 91% respectively. When we look at how the Black voter chose at the rate of 96% to promote the MACHINE that already controls all of our LOCAL civic institutions into the WHITE HOUSE in addition to their control over both houses of Congress - this was not RACISM but "Black people knowing who has our best interests in mind".

It is time for you, Mr DeVega to document WHERE our "Permanent Interests" have been ORGANICALLY developed in the "Progressive Mission Accomplished" areas where they operate in an uncontested manner per your efforts and advocacy.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

I Agree With Keith Olbermann's Words - But ONLY If He Wasn't Attempting To Absolve Himself



I am forced to agree with Olbermann that the past slate of journalists were not objective.

Keith Olbermann and other operatives from MSNBC merely suffer from the notion that their INTENTIONS make their antics justified.

Olbermann claims that he has been far more critical of Obama than has been Fox News. What he fails to note is that he is critical of Obama FROM THE LEFT. He does not criticize Obama or anyone else from the perspective of absolute results. In as much as the right-wing is the source of organic evil - he positions himself as needing to cast low blows against them in defense from their low blows. No one with an objective viewpoint would claim that MSNBC is any less biased than is Fox News.

They both will cherry pick the favorable points which prove their objectivity. The problem is that they fail to make note of the other facts that lay upon the ground.

Olbermann is attacking Ted Koppel about being silent against the Iraq War. It is quite interesting that we now have an Afghanistan War that has "mission creeped" far beyond its original purpose. People like Olbermann would have you to believe that a war STARTED under false pretenses is more evil than a war that spirals along have adopted new justifications.

In the case of torture - Waterboarding of 3 terror suspects is "torture" yet using predator drones to blow up an entire household that is thought to contain a terrorist - while also killing his wife and children IS NOT.

The real power of the leftist press is its ability to KEEP THEIR ENEMIES ON TRIAL as they look past the present offensive that would bother them IF there was an adversarial Commander In Chief in place.

Friday, November 12, 2010

Rachel Maddow & Jon Stewart - Progressivism Is A Function Of Conservatism



Why does MSNBC do what it does? Because it needs to fight the "organic evil" of Fox News.

THEY are evil but WE are honorable. When we do the same thing we are merely fighting them for the honor of the people.

Sunday, November 7, 2010

What Rachael Maddow And Some "Progressives Who Are Black" Focus Upon In The Keith Olbermann Scandal

If you ever want to know why certain people with a certain ideology fail to actually "progress" but instead stagnate - look no further than the recent scandal with leftwing bomb thrower Keith Olbermann.

In the various arguments from the left to defend the campaign contributions of Keith Olbermann that got him suspended their main exculpatory evidence used to defend Olbermann was the contributions that FOX NEWS hosts had executed upon.

Let's set this up properly.  On MSNBC and various leftist circles Fox News is dismissed as a "non-news organization".   Even the President of the United States says that Fox is a threat to the country.  (Afterward he invited "Media Matters" operatives in to the White House).

If we take the "Professional Left" at their word we must conclude that it is STANDARDS that raises MSNBC over Fox News.  "They don't do certain things that Fox does".

Ironically when one of the darlings of "The Professional Left" is busted by a muckraking media blog, Politico, as having made several political contributions - what did we see "The Professional Left" do as a defense?

  1. Point to their HIGHER standards and make the case that indeed Olbermann had violated them, diving in the mud with Fox?
  2. Use Fox News as the reference standard for Keith Olbermann's actions.  "Why are you punishing Keith Olbermann when Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck and others have done the same thing?"


Take this same concept and apply them as a frequently used antic by "The Professional Left".  They are not interested in promoting high standards.   When they are caught with their hands in the cookie jar they are merely interested in lowering the standard to the lowest common denominator.  

You believe that they are the "moral compass" of this nation at your own peril. 

Saturday, November 6, 2010

Bigot Bill Maher Once Again Makes The Case: Right-Wing Has Organic Evil. Left-Wing's Antics Are Merely A Response To Evil-Right




The power of "INTENTIONS" and "INDICTMENTS" are the "Yin and Yank" of leftism.

I assure you that the average Progressive-fundamentalist who listens to this diatribe by Bill Maher would have their beliefs reaffirmed.

Though there are mercifully few points of "violence" had by the Tea Party gatherings in the past few years large leftist gatherings have been indeed violent:

  • In Pittsburgh when the G20 Summit came to town
  • In Oakland in response to the transit police shooting of Oscar Grant - downtown Oakland was torched
  • In France (and other European nations) those who were pissed at the planned austerity plans to allow the nation to survive took to the streets.  They torched cars and broke windows.
Bill Maher will always have his own version of events that highlight his own bigoted viewpoint.

Notice how the non-partisan "Restore Sanity" rally is heralded as an accomplishment because it was "bigger than Glenn Beck's right wing rally" yet Maher and many other Progressive Fundamentalists gloss over "October 2, 2010" - the day the Labor Left came to town.  Of these 3 marches which were branded as "Left wing" and political?

Why did Bill Maher make use of a "non-partisan" rally rather than mention the size of the unabashedly LEFTIST march?   Do you see why with these "inspectors" that no one noticed that those who came to town on Oct 2nd and claimed to "follow King" did not want to have an ANTI-WAR march because they did not want to up-end the present "Commander in Chief".  

Friday, November 5, 2010

Its A Good Thing That Media Matters, Huffington Post and AfroSpear Don't Have Similar Standards

MSNBC Suspends Progressive-Fundamentalist Host Keith Olbermann For His Political Campaign Donations To Various Democrats


NEW YORK — MSNBC has suspended prime-time host Keith Olbermann indefinitely without pay for contributing to the campaigns of three Democratic candidates this election season.

Olbermann acknowledged to NBC that he donated $2,400 apiece to the campaigns of Kentucky Senate candidate Jack Conway and Arizona Reps. Raul Grivalva and Gabrielle Giffords.

NBC News prohibits its employees from working on, or donating to, political campaigns unless a special exception is granted by the news division president — effectively a ban. Olbermann's bosses did not find out about the donations until after they were made. The website Politico first reported the donations.

"I became aware of Keith's political contributions late last night," Phil Griffin, MSNBC's chief executive, said Friday. "Mindful of NBC News policy and standards, I have suspended him indefinitely without pay."


How ironic. "Color Of Change" has a "Turn Off Fox" campaign and has been trying to get Fox Host Glenn Beck off of the air for a long while.  George Soros recently funded such an effort.

Turns out that their BFF White Liberal Snarling Fox was the first to go instead.

This would be a great time for "Color Of Change" and "AfroSpear" to do a mass protest in front of the MSNBC headquarters DEMANDING that they hire a "Black Progressive" as Olbermann's replacement.  You know, seeing that DIVERSITY is the goal of the "Progressive who is Black" and the White Liberal Snarling Foxes who convinces him of their commitment to the concept.

Warren Ballentine Says - When They Talk About {Mystery Government Official} They Are Talking About YOU, Black Man!"

From the Wednesday Warren Ballentine Show


"He went to the best schools and got a quality education just as they told Black people to do and still they try to bring him down"


"They told us to speak articulately and yet they talk about him like a dog"


You all need to see that when THEY are tearing HIM down THEY are tearing you and all other Black people down.



We are fighting WHITE SUPREMACY who does not want to lose its power. They are wanting to tear down HIM and all other Black people.




"Black people I LOVE YOU. You will never know how much I love you. We need to stick together and FIGHT. We need to LOVE EACH OTHER. We need to make sure that NO ONE DISRESPECTS us as they try to disrespect HIM. We need to stand beside him.


END OF DIALOGUE

Stay with me people.

Now even though you thought that Ballentine was talking about this guy.

I need for you to first watch THIS video:



Now imagine if you were forced to insert THIS BLACK MAN'S picture into the frame above?
Doesn't he hold an "official office"?
Why then is it that the "Black Defenders" are often heard saying the very same words that thousands of Black men heard just prior to them being lynched?



  1. YOU need to decide if "RACE" has an ideological component to it.
  2. IF you say that his IDEOLOGY is a threat to Black people then please explain why you are so silent about IDEOLOGY of "The Street Pirate" who rakes up far more murders and assaults of Black people than does this man.  Prior to the "death sentence" reaches this man's desks an array of checks and balances have been executed upon.   While the Street Pirate acts on his own accord he is ultimately not an IDEOLOGICAL threat to you and thus he passes under your radar.

Thursday, November 4, 2010

What If The Next Republican President Took The Advice Of These White Liberal Snarling Foxes In Regards To Meeting W/ The CBC?



I am trying desperately to avoid doing the photographic negative of what bothered me so much today as I listened to the local "Fight The Power" radio station: In the face of certain intractable problems within the Black community that were discussed - find a "White person who did the same thing" as a means of soothing one's mind.

However I recall that when Republican George W Bush was in office it was the Congressional Black Caucus who attacked him for refusing to meet with them to discuss "Black issues".  Bush knows as Moore and O'Donnell knows - when you meet with your ideological and partisan adversary who has the goal of "getting you out of the office" - you don't leave yourself unguarded.

The correction to both of these flawed analysis is provided with a more accurate premise.

As a voter MY GOAL is "NOT" to "insure that Obama has another term" OR that the Republicans are kept in check.  The bulk of the problems that we face with our broken political system is that the rank & file is using the political system as a proxy for their ideological fight.

The best way that President Obama can insure he has a second term is to clearly identify the key problems with the nation, lay out REASONABLE plans on how to mitigate the harm and execute these points that can be done in a given time frame while articulating those elements that require a more long term vision and leadership.   With the incremental plan in place toward this end both Democrat and Republican can lay out their agenda in reference to this goal.

Today we have nothing but ideologues that are destroying this nation because they are not focused on the streets but instead what is going on in the legislative halls.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

The Strategy Of Claiming Voter Fraud - Rachel Maddow Please Meet Jack & Jill Politics



See the 4:40 mark.



Now let us look at the following post with Jack & Jill Politics.
Election Protection & Voter Suppression

So here is an example of "Mall Cop" fraud.

For the progressive Rachel Maddow - who never saw a "Black Street Pirate Murder" that was EQUAL to that of a right wing murder we hear one side of the dynamic of voting politics - claims of "Voter Fraud" as a means of a gateway to more strict scrutiny of voting rights.

Notice that the Mall Cop - Rachael Maddow would see the racism chasing done by the Civil Rights Democrat groups in which they scour the nation looking for examples of how Black people have had their voting rights suppressed by some election day drama - Dr Maddow does not label this with the same nefarious intent.

Even when the voting process is administered by Black Democrats and their own incompetency in following procedures is the reason for the glitch (see Fulton County Georgia) the narrative that "Black people had their voting rights suppressed" rings true as a grievance.

I am working on a brand new post that is tentatively labeled:  "Has The Grio or The Root ever did a report that was critical of their own corporate sponsors"?

If you think that Dr Maddow was going to get any hard ball questions from the interviewer from TheGrio when their site is a spawn of MSNBC you are indeed mistaken.

Michael Eric Dyson Demands That Obama Become A Race Mongerer And A Class Exploiter



I realize that the "Professional Left Blacks" are hurting today and as a result they will say anything.

Go to the 1:40 mark in the video and tell me that I am not hearing what I think I just heard.

GONE is the "unity" message instead Dyson tells his guy Obama that he needs to become:

  • A Race Man
  • Use Ethnicity As A Shield
  • A Class Man
Michael Eric Dyson states that Obama failed to brag about his "accomplishments" and had no narrative.

What Dr Dyson fails to realize is that BOTH of these elements were injected into the Black community by the "Lampblack Yellow Journalists".

(Note: "Lampblack Yellow Journalist" is NOT empty slander on my part.  It does NOT represent my own ideological intolerance.   It IS a term that identifies so-called Black Journalists who routinely leverage their own IDEOLOGICAL bigotry to advance their notions of racial progress BUT only for the benefit of their viewpoint in the American Political Domain.   In doing so they are forced to look past the CONNECTION between the continuing problems within the Black community and the aggregate intransigence which has failed to substantively address it.

When given the choice between INSPECTING the actual efficacy of their own methodology and blaming the continuing problems on White/Capitalistic RACISM - they go for racism because it allows them to retain their own ideological comfort without running against the grain.  

With this as their modality their jounalistic efforts consists of going out to PROVE their claims of racism and conservative ideological undercutting of the Black interests as the prime problem.

In addition the evidence of growing progressive power over our communities and in the hands of their White and progressive special interest partners does not provoke THEM to switch their critique upon their own ideological home, with the purposes of obtaining more proficiency rather than raw power.   These two points represent the distinction between Black people being used as a pawn for progressive/Democratic POWER versus Black people's interests being addressed through the competency construction that is fomented via the institutions that are now controlled by favorable people.

Their loyalties prevent them from scrutinizing the main force that is derailing the Black community's interests today:   The Black Progressive Establishment Overlay and its unwillingness to MANAGE the human resources that are attached to it.  They prefer an externally focused struggle for unity purposes).





Dr Dyson what do you think that:
  • Eugene Robinson
  • Earl Ofari Hutchenson
  • Cynthia Tucker
  • Bob Herbert 
  • Stanley Crouch
  • Leonard Pitts
  • Tonya Weathersbee
  • Derrick Z Jackson
  • DeWayne Wickham
  • Errol Lewis
  • Charles Blow
  • Hazel Trice Edney
  • Rochelle Riley 
  • Roland Martin
have all been doing for the past 3 years?

Mr Dyson the corruption of the Black Press has reached an all time high.

There is little correlation between what is happening on the streets of Black America as it is governed by favorable people to you AND what is likely to be reported upon or opined by the "usual suspects".

The truth is that you all have 100% folded the "Black Community Development" agenda in with the Democratic Party and Progressive ideological entrenchment.

IF you indeed were a "Race Man" you would demand a recalibration, adopting a strategy that is more EFFECTIVE.