Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Brother Peack Maker & AfroSpear - The Gift That Keeps On Giving

Mr. Saltsman obviously has the same sense of humor as those white students back in Jena, Louisiana who thought hanging a noose under a tree was a good joke to play on black students. It was only after the manifestation of some of the worst racial disparity began to collect the nation’s attention with marches coordinated by members of the black community from every corner of the country did some people see that hanging nooses isn’t just fun and games but something to be taken seriously. Mr. Saltsman probably needs to learn the same lessons about his race tinged humor.

Brother Peace Maker on "Barack The Magic Negro

I am no journalist. This blogging is a hobby for me. If I don't go back and proof my posts - there are some submissions that I make which don't measure up to my standards. I am willing to admit my shortcomings as a blogger. Thus I am also willing to cut some slack to others who have a 9 to 5 and more important things to focus upon - just as I do.

One thing that I will not do, however, is to manufacture a scenario. I may change the names to protect the innocent but I will not pull something from where the sun don't shine. (Well - In truth I try to reserve these type of fabricated tales for the "Parallel Hood" site. But at least you know what you are getting when you go there. My fiction is compartmentalized.)

Read the clip up above and then read the link from the article from which it came. Is this troubling to you? How is it that Brother Peace Maker saw fit to use creative liberties to assume that since this Republican guy who is his target (what a surprise) had a particular sentiment regarding what went on in Jena LA?

In the end - it didn't matter now did it? The AfroSpear aggregation site saw fit to public the fictional insertion because it fit within their general bias.

But of course - since I called them on this offense....I am an agent for "the White man". Slander of your adversaries, not accuracy is a highly favored attribute among the BQPFRC.

How To Make A Black Progressive-Fundamentalist Scream: "Fox News Stays Ahead of CNN in Viewership"

Fox News stays ahead of CNN in viewership

Question: What is "racist" in the domain of Black/White relations?

Answer: Anything that the prevailing number of Black folks SAY is offensive to them.

Thus it comes as no surprise that "The Fox News Channel" is seen as the "White People's network' - the news oracle for The Republican Party......which is also racist and "The White People's party". After all - did you see many Blacks in Minneapolis this year during the convention? That proves it. Racist!

By contrast Keith Olbermann and "MSNBC" is the station for "the Brothers". Since they attack Bush, the Republicans and anything conservative (hey I sat down and forced myself to watch Olbermann's show last night - I should know this) MSNBC is loved by the Black Progressive-Fundamentalists because they both have the same set of enemies.

The fact that Fox News is still #1 only proves one thing in the minds of the "Black Quasi-Socialist Progressive-Fundamentalist Racism Chaser".......America is STILL a very, very RACIST nation.

When what will be the sign that America has CHANGED from her evil and racist ways?

  • When MSNBC becomes the top rated news channel
  • When "DailyKOS", "The Huffington Post" and "" becomes the standard bearers for all economic and social news on the web
  • When all of the web sites associated with "AfroSpear" become the default home pages for all Americans - White, Black and otherwise

Saturday, December 27, 2008

Some People In "The Academy" Fear Being Tossed Out Into The Real World

From "The Blacksmythe" in regards to his fear that the economy is going to make things rough in the ivory towers where he resides comfortably today.

With colleges and universities losing their endowments more and more graduate students will need to go outside of the academy for work. People on the tenure track will be placed in a much more tenuous position–assuming that tenure continues to exist. If the days of big advances are gone, then writers are going to have to figure out some other way to make ends meet.

And unlike the New Deal, when FDR created programs for artists…I’m not sure Obama has anything like this coming.

Let me say in advance that I do note the following statements that the Blacksmythe has in his post:

There are a whole set of conversations about the future of publishing, the future of the academy, the future of the music business. Black intellectuals haven’t been significant voices here.

If the brother were to step outside of the box he would make note of the outdated modality of the brick and mortar campus. With information technology so prevalent there is a greater opportunity to make academic resources available to more people than ever before.

The only problem is that they would have to come face to face with a fact that many academics have long denied in their battles with the corporate world - certain business models are necessary to PRODUCE CAPITAL.

Gone will be their altruistic motivations that "people should be placed over all profit considerations". It is these profits (revenues to be more technically correct) that fund salaries and the buildings upon which this learning is housed.

Where are the "Black Intellectuals" who are framing the new educational processes by which people are indeed developed in preparation for the real world?

Instead I listened to the barber who cut my hair yesterday tell me of the need for FREE EDUCATION to allow people to develop. When I asked "Who is going to pay for this 'free education'?" He said " the government through the tax payers!"

Friday, December 26, 2008

Cheers For The Shoes Thrown At Bush. Silence Over The Bullets That Hit Iraqi Soldiers

Militants Escape Iraqi Jail, At Least 14 Dead

On NPR's "Tell Me More" I listened to a caller sing a song about President Bush being the target of a shoe attack. The American caller asked for some shoes of his own to throw.

All the while, back in Iraq - the marchers in support of the "Shoe Attacker" who had praise for his execution of the most indignant act that one could do to an Iraqi person - have now cleared the street.

They are not likely to return to the streets in protest of the "most FINAL act" that one could do to an Iraqi person - KILL THEM DEAD.

BAGHDAD (Reuters) -- Three senior Islamist militants escaped from their cells in clashes overnight at a police station in Iraq's western city of Al-Ramadi, which killed at least seven police and seven militants, officials said.

Prisoners being held at the Al-Fursan facility overpowered a policeman who entered a cell early on December 26, stealing the man's weapon and killing him, said Major General Tariq Yusuf, police commander for Al-Anbar Governorate.

Six other police officers, including a lieutenant colonel and a captain, were killed in subsequent clashes and six were wounded, Yusuf said. Seven of the militants inside the police prison were killed in the fighting, he said.

Police imposed a curfew and searched homes the following morning in Al-Ramadi, a largely peaceful city 100 kilometers west of Baghdad, Yusuf said.

An Interior Ministry official, who requested anonymity, put the death toll among police at 10 and said that Lieutenant Colonel Abdul Ghaini al-Dulaimi, who heads the station, died.

Both Yusuf, also known as Tariq al-Dulaimi, and the ministry official said three leaders of the Al-Qaeda-linked Sunni Islamist group Islamic State in Iraq escaped in the fighting.

The Interior Ministry official said that 23 out of a total of 40 detainees initially escaped but were later recaptured.

Al-Anbar Governorate, a vast desert area bordering Syria, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, was once the heart of Iraq's Sunni insurgency.

But it became far quieter after local Sunni Arabs began supporting U.S. efforts against Al-Qaeda and other militants in late 2006.

The United States handed security control of Al-Anbar to the Iraqi government in September, but U.S. Marines are still stationed in the province.

Yusuf said that police were going house to house with photos of the escaped inmates. He pledged the militants would be captured.

"The people of this city will help us bring them back to justice," he said.

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

"A Cross Between Keith Olbermann and Bill Maher With A Black Perspective"

"A Cross Between Keith Olbermann and Bill Maher With A Black Perspective"

BET's Jeff Johnson

At times I listen to some of you all and I realize that you have no clue as to where you stand on the ideological spectrum.  What is a "cross between Keith Olberman and Bill Maher"?  Is that someone who is to the left of Socialism?

How is a "cross between Keith Olberman and Bill Maher" anything unique to the Black community and the prevailing perspective?  Will the operatives WITHIN THE BLACK COMMUNITY be duely challenged for the results that they have rendered with such a fusion of these two White leftists?

I have listened to Jeff Johnson on a number of occassions.  He is hardly the empty left wing operatives that Olberman and Maher are.  In fact he makes sense most of the time.

I guess I should consider the source of the statement - The Huffington Post.

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Cynthia Tucker Is So Predictable - Rev Rick Warren

Cynthia Tucker: Put differences aside, let us pray together

Here is the framework that Cynthia Tucker uses when APPEARING TO ask the left to come to their senses about a "rightward" move executed by a political figure that she favors.

1) Set up a straw-man argument by which she can attack CONSERVATIVES in pointing out that her leftist friends are doing the same thing:

hat’s ironic. Gay-marriage advocates have adopted the same overwrought logic that many conservatives applied to Obama’s relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, retired pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago

2) Avoid attacking a public figure that she likes despite the fact that if an adversary did the very same thing she would be in the lead of the attacks received.
How could Obama listen to Wright’s offensive rants all those years unless he agreed with them, they asked.

Could anyone imagine that if Saxby Chambliss was found to have sat in a White church that had audio tapes with the same disparaging comments as Rev Wright had produced that he would get away with what Tucker is allowing Obama to do? It is all a matter of RIGHT WING vs LEFT WING stereotypes. Where as right wing hate is malicious and attempts to separate - left wing hatred is criticism of the powers that be, hoping that they will change for the better.

3) Cheerlead for the Public Officials that she likes.

Among Obama’s several admirable qualities is his ability to sit and converse — debating, but also listening — with those with whom he strongly disagrees.
That spirit of cooperation is frail right now, bruised and bloodied by the wedge politics that found favor over the past several years.

Karl Rove and his ilk cynically used hot-button issues such as gay marriage to drive elections, caring naught about the hostility and hurt such campaigns left behind.

4) Avoid any direct praise for her ideological enemies REGARDLESS of what they do. Attack their extremist base instead

Warren, it should be noted, endured blistering criticism from fellow social conservatives — Phyllis Schlafly, among others, signed an open letter of protest — for extending the invitation to a pro-choice senator from Illinois.

Did you hear one single DIRECT word of praise from Cynthia Tucker about pastor Rick Warren? How many millions of people's lives have been positively impacted by his "Purpose Driven Life" materials? How many people around the world, including Africans have benefited from his global evangelism? In his HIV efforts, Warren has not cast judgment on the patient but has only sought his healing. Do you detect this from Ms Tucker's rants? Of course not.

Other Notes: But as a member of the Christian left, I would still bow my head for a prayer led by the Rev. Warren (assuming he doesn’t disparage any group in the process).
Now keep in mind that despite the fact that "The Left" frequently "disparages other people and groups" while they are at the podium, with Ms. Tucker we can be sure that these other groups have DESERVED IT. Just a few weeks ago Rev Write called Elisabeth Hasselbeck "that dumb broad" from the pulpit. This did not trigger a response from Ms. Tucker. I am quite sure that her Leftist-Christian orientation affords her some feminist sensibilities.

Friday, December 19, 2008

What If The White Liberal Huffington Post Was Consistent About Drug Problems And The Politicians That Presided Over Them?

Thanks to a blogger named DMG I was brought late to the game with regards what the left wing blob force was running during the recent presidential campaign.  It seems that former mayor Sarah Palin of Wasilla should be held accountable for the meth problems that took place in the city while she was mayor.

Huffington Post: Wasilla's Meth Problem Made Palin's Borough The Meth Capital Of Alaska

Please allow me the opportunity to document my views on the matter before I continue.  I don't have a problem with "the left" attacking leadership at the national level when they deserve attack or at the local level when they are as deserving.  My problem is that they only do such attacks when it successfully accomplishes their targeted political agenda.  When you so clearly engage in such fraud I am going to call you out.  The left depends on the presence of a loyal band of information consumers who are so desperate to believe anything negative about their ideological adversaries that they will fail to understand the big picture gravity of what they have just agreed to hold someone accountable for.  This so frequently undercuts the previous arguments that they had been making.

Thus we have such a situation.
If a small town mayor is to be held accountable for her city becoming the "Meth Capital Of Alaska" - then what should we say about the big city Democratic mayors and political machines who have presided over massive drug epidemics and resulting blood baths?

Do you see Huffington Post?  Do you see how you have undercut your entire strategy?  You were seeking to wage a directed attack at one woman who was a threat to you and now you have opened up the box for scrutiny of your entire premise.

So frequently drug epidemics and the related criminal activity is blamed on FEDERAL DRUG POLICIES.   So frequently we hear.

  • {fill in the blank} people don't own any airplanes that can be used to import drugs
  • Drug Addicts need treatment,  not incarceration
  • How is all of this happening while the police are looking on?  The police must be on the take

In this instance, however, this attack on Sarah Palin was only to be used in a compartmentalized basis.  

I recall in the year 2000 various leftwing attackers said that under Governor George W. Bush Texas was the #1 polluting state, proving that Bush is no friend of the environment.  In the year 2004 they said that pollution in various states had increased due to the rollback of environmental regulations by President Bush.  Wait a minute.  Why didn't they say anyting about President Clinton's oversight of the state of Texas when Bush was governor?  Why, in 2004 didn't they focus on the individual governors as they did with Bush in 2000?  Do you all see how fraudulent and dishonest you are?

I would love for you all to STAY LOCAL.  If we could blame the drug problems on the local officials and demand action - that would be a start.  With so many large city political machines being ran by the Democrats you'd be forced to pressure them into DOING SOMETHING EFFECTIVE, for once.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

The Source Magazine & Black Enterprise Magazine

Note: This entry is more for my own records per my research on the link between Democratic Politics, Hip Hop and The Criminal Element.

I learned of Hip Hop expert Dasun Allah in the movie "Hip Hop vs The Police". He talked about the police being corrupt. I wonder if he ever wrote a story about himself?

'Source' magazine editor Dasun Allah vandalizes church
UPI News Service, 10/21/2005

The editor of The Source magazine admitted to vandalizing a Jehovah's Witness assembly hall in New York's Harlem neighborhood.

Dasun Allah, editor of the hip-hop magazine, told the New York Post he "tagged" the building to expose the religion's "hypocrisy."

Police were called to the scene where Allah had painted a number of cryptic symbols, but the graffifi had been painted over by then, the Post said Friday.

Allah, 32, said he was kicked out of his Jehovah's Witnesses church more than 13 years ago and now belongs to the Islam-based Nation of Gods and Earths.

"They said I didn't fit the criteria, because, to put it lightly, I wasn't a choirboy," Allah said.

Dasun Allah Fired From The Source
Dave Mays, co-founder of The Source magazine, has dismissed the former Editor-in-Chief and will now man the head position.

Mays replaces Dasun Allah, who was fired from the magazine last week.

"Right now I am taking the role of Editor-in-Chief," Mays told “There were just other issues that caused this to happen in this particular way," Mays said, adding there were "no plans for a new editor right now.

"Ryan Ford is still our executive editor. Dasun was the other executive editor and they had the same powers."

Allah was appointed Editor-in-Chief of The Source in September, one month after Joshua "Fahiym" Ratcliffe resigned from the magazine.

In October, Allah was arraigned in Manhattan Criminal Court on vandalism charges after admitting to spraying painting in a Jehovah Witness assembly hall in Harlem, New York.

Although Mays didn't elaborate on the reasons for Allah's termination, he praised the former staffer.

"His views and opinions are great. We love him," Mays said about Allah. "He has written some of the best articles for The Source. He really understands Hip-Hop culture."

Mays' new position is the latest in a string of developments for the self-proclaimed "Hip-Hop Bible."

Last week, Mays and his fellow Source co-founder Raymond "Benzino" Scott obtained a temporary retraining order against The Source Entertainment Inc.'s board of directors.

The order came as a result of attempts by the board to oust Mays and Scott from the company, claiming the pair's association with the company hurts "not only the employees of The Source, but all of its investors, vendors, subscribers and readers."

The Source Entertainment Inc. is the parent company of The Source magazine.

The Black Enterprise/Greenwich Street Corporate Growth Partners L.P. is a $91 million private equity investment fund created in 1997 to finance the growth of established minority-owned, managed, or targeted businesses.

Black Enterprise invested $12 million dollars in The Source in return for a minority stake in the company and seats on the board of directors.

The Source defaulted on an $18 million loan from Textron Financial Partners. Textron filed a lawsuit against The Source in Oct. 2005, seeking control of the magazine.


With Obama Now We Learn That Cynthia Tucker Is Against Illegal Immigration

Comedian Jim Carey said that in one day the view of the United State was changed around the world. In one election we became the "good guys" again. In reading the latest edition of AJC's Cynthia Tucker I now see that this change has permeated internally as well.

Ms Tucker who spent a decade blaming "greedy corporations" seeking to keep wages artificially low against American workers and for greasing the skids to have illegal immigrants into the nation to exploit them for their cheap labor has clearly been smitten by CHANGE just as so many others. I wonder if the great number of Obama ads that were plastered in her paper had anything to do with her change in course? (I also didn't hear any critique about 'money and politics' since the Democrat had the mother load of cash this year and used it to his advantage)

Cynthia Tucker: Homeland security now means jobs

So let me get this straight about Ms Tucker's new position as it relates to the Obama administration. She appears to be supportive of building "The Wall". Building this obstruction on our southern boarder will insure that the illegal aliens are kept out of the nation AND will create construction jobs as part of the "infrastructure investment" that Obama has promised.

It is quite interesting that under Bush the Progressive caucus stood vehemently opposed to the construction of the wall for humanitarian reasons. Now that America needs jobs this barrier makes a bit more sense. Did something CHANGE that I missed?

Ironically Ms Tucker tells us that illegal immigration has declined as the economy in America has eroded. In my deductive reasoning I must conclude that during the mid-2000s when illegal immigration was all the concern that Ms Tucker actually DID see a booming economy despite what her columns at the time said otherwise.

It is important to maintain a baseline reference on the views of certain people. This is the best way to detect their cheerleading spirit. At some point Ms Tucker will run out of content in which she comments on the utility of "Obama the Black President" and the symbolic impact upon Black America and America in general. Instead certain policy decisions will be made and the results will be in front of us for all to see.

Let's see how Ms Tucker responds in kind - especially since the Republicans are in remission.

Saturday, December 13, 2008

"White Progressive Sources" Are OK; White Conservative Sources Get You Called An "Uncle Tom"

The Progressive

By the time you click the link above "The" will likely have changed its content. Today they have no less than 3 articles linked to "The Huffington Post" featured on their web site. While "The" purports to represent the views and interests of the Black community - it comes as no surprise that they too frequently simply echo the views of "White Progressives", adding a bit of "Gumbo seasoning" as it passes through the portal.

If and when a Black Conservative is heard "echoing the policy views" of the White Conservative - he is dutifully called a parrot. An operative sent forth into the Black community by his "paid masters" to convince the flock that they must listen.

What other than POPULAR SENTIMENT distinguishes the antics of these two groups? I have long said that there is no QUANTITY element to the concept of "SELLOUT". "Sellout" is WHAT YOU DO in the way of placing someone else's ultimate interests ahead of your own, not HOW MAN PEOPLE ARE DOING IT. When you have a large quantity of people "Selling out", including the people who are most inclined to call out someone for doing so you simply have a situation where you do so but are not called to the carpet.

Christian Progressive-Fundamentalist Watch

I realize that this post is going to motivate a "Internet Harassment" suit against me. She would rather spew her hatred and not be called into account.

I never thought that I would see a group of PROGRESSIVES begging to have GOVERNMENT MONEY go to a CORPORATION. Thus if logic holds - They say that the evil, racist Republicans are against the deal to the car companies BECAUSE they are against the payment of UNION WAGES. Doesn't it stand to reason then that the ONLY reason why these PROGRESSIVE FUNDAMENTALISTS are FOR THE DEAL is because the LABOR UNIONS ultimately benefit from this payout that allows them to keep their jobs?

Jesus please help this woman for she knows not what she does!!

For those readers who insist on continuing to belong to this party; the party of non-inclusion and big government; the party that always brings a recession on its list of Things To Do While in Washington

Christian Progressive-Fundamentalist:

Do facts matter to you?

Can we compare the "Rust Belt" where organized labor dominates to the "Racist Non-Unionized South"? Where as the domestic auto manufacturing is strong (while I acknowledge its recent problems) - the Norther UNIONIZED manufacturing operations are on their death bed. I heard an economic report the other day that while Toyota and GM manufactured roughly the same number of cars globally last year - Toyota made about $25 billion in profits while GM LOST about $30 billion. (These numbers are from memory so don't quote me)

These non-unionized workers at auto plants in the South that you speak of - are they being BEATEN? Are they getting paid $2 per hour and have to work for tips? The truth is that when it comes down to it there are enough LABOR LAWS in place protecting the workers (fought for by the unions) that the UNION has rendered itself obsolete EXCEPT as a loyal vote for your party - and taking membership dues to fill Democratic campaign chests.

It is frustrating to listen to people attempt to make RECESSIONS a function of the party in power. Many of these same people are unable to look at the PERMANENT RECESSION - otherwise known as Camden, Newark, Detroit, Baltimore, SouthWest Philly, Milwaukee that their favored party governs over.

In addition, Christian Progressive-Fundamentalist I have little doubt that you were the biggest cheerleader for the "ECONOMIC GOOD TIMES" that Clinton policies brought forth but you are unable to make note of the CONTINUITY of events between then and now. Let me be clear I AM NOT BLAMING CLINTON....I am saying the FINANCIAL MARKET run up during that time has the same players that are pleading for mercy now. This article should assist you. (How The Internet Bubble Broke Rules, Records, Bank Accounts

SHYT on the Economy, SHYT on the Government, SHYT on the American People, and those of you who voted for this ticket, which I still consider a BIGOTED ticket - explain why the hell do YOU KEEP VOTING AGAINST YOUR OWN BEST INTERESTS?

Christian Progressive-Fundamentalist:

Does the King James version say "Shyt" or "Shyt-ith"?

My BEST INTERESTS are Education, Safe Streets, Local Economic Development and Healthy Lifestyles. When I view where Black folks live in our highest concentrations it appears that VOTING AGAINST ONE'S BEST INTERESTS is something that is better demonstrated in the Black voting pattern. In fact people are VOTING rather than MANAGING. (How do you explain this graphic?

I guess you would rather starve under ReThug rule, but know while you’re starving and losing your home to foreclosure, and losing your job to outsourcing or cutbacks, that you did your part in trying to keep that N—ER out of the White House. Your racism is ingrained TO THAT POINT

Christian Progressive-Fundamentalist:

I see more RACISM in the Quasi-Socialist BIGOTS who cast Black people and aggrieved workers on a perpetual OUTWARD fight rather than working to develop ORGANIC infrastructure. If you do a tale of the tape and make note of the fact that despite the growth in the number of districts that YOUR PARTY had dominate control over - the people's PRODUCTIVITY has attenuated. Thus you support policies of REDISTRIBUTION rather than PRODUCTIVITY. I am not sure where you live but for some reason I bet that the poor have been marginalized by the PROGRESSIVE policies that have pushed them out of Oakland, SFO, Chicago, Boston, NYC, Miami and Atlanta.

will be going to the CEOs who orchestrated this royal Eff-Up, while these banks are consistently cutting back and laying off tens of thousands from their workforce.

Christian Progressive Fundamentalist - do you consider yourself a hate filled person? Or is your "hatred" in your pursuit of HELPING people justified?

Where did you get such FLAWED ANALYSIS as above?
Could you PROVE that these CEOs themselves will be getting this money as you CLAIM?

The same FINANCE system that brought us the "Clinton-Democratic boom" that you are so proud of is targeted to receive the largest portion of this $700 billion so that they can start LENDING AGAIN and get the economy out of its doldrums.

The danger of you, Christian Progressive-Fundamentalist is that so much of your analysis is founded on ideologically bigoted and partisan bigoted hatred and anger. Thus in you mission with the CBC Watch you are effectively seeking to have them execute policies that YOU BELIEVE are in the BEST INTERESTS OF BLACK PEOPLE and the working class. In truth they are only in alignment with WHAT YOU THINK.

As people you favor have taken over our urban cores - these same places have been places of INJURY to the people who remain within.

These "Racist Southerners" who are snagging up $1 billion auto manufacturing plants that are owned by foreigners and NON-UNION are not the problem. What you need to do is to ask your snot-nosed young PROGRESSIVES who are driving Honda Civics, Scions and Mazda 626s to 'LOOK FOR THE UNION LABEL' and choose to purchase cars from the UNIONIZED CORPORATIONS that you are so desperately seeking to provide government funding to. (How ironic)

For the record I own 2 American owned vehicles. Both of them have "UAW" stickers plastered on the rear driver's side windows.

You'd be far more effective if you turned your anger and hatred into PRAGMATIC action within the ranks of the consumer and the workers.

(Talk to your girl Rikyrah)

Thursday, December 11, 2008

2 "Weak Minded Negroes" - Depart And Then Talk About Where They Laid Their Ideological Heads

UptownSteve and BT - Depart

After a few weeks of wondering around the conservative blogesphere seeking to find a different group of Black Conservatives to harass - UptownSteve - after getting banned from BookerRising and Baldilox (for calling Black women out of their names by the way) settles in on the Progressive-Fundamentalist Field-Negro Blog.

BT - or who I call "BET Uncut" an "Elitist Black Democrat" who loves supporting "the hood" with his long as they don't try to come through to his town in Virginia has departed as well.

The posters at Booker Rising are called "boot licking" Black conservatives though they both spent nearly a year dedicating most of their time posting.

BET Uncut got pissed when Booker Rising featured an article that I wrote inspecting the linkage between the Democratic Party, Civil Rights Movement and the Black Criminal Element and Hip Hop. Maybe they need to read the updated evidence:

Democrats Need To Inspect Their Alliances

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

The Vertically Aligned Constrol Over The Black Community

I still have the diagram of the model which I am attempting to express inside of my head. This model represents that system of locks and levees that stand between the members of the Black community and the flow of information that is received within.

Preachers play a significant role in shaping the opinions of our people.

The list entails:

  • Black Preachers
  • Black Politicians
  • Black Entertainers / Artists
  • Black Educators
  • Black Activists / Labor Organizers
  • Black Press / Opinion Writers / Radio & Television Personalities
  • White Liberals
All of these individuals work in vertical alignment to maintain the status quo within the Black community - condemning those who THEY see fit to be condemned, protecting those who may need to be condemned but who are held in regard and thus are bathed in the silence of the protection racket they are running.

I will craft a model of how this works. I just need to continue thinking about it for a while longer

Watching The Watchers - Africa Action

Africa Action

Over the years I have been monitoring the group called "Africa Action" and made note of how their progressive bias often causes them to manage Africa by managing America. This one off policy often does little to develop ORGANIC governance capabilities within the African countries themselves.

Now we have an interesting change of events. In Barack Obama they no doubt have a US president who is in line with their ideological leanings. Over the next few years I will keep an eye on them to insure that the following article: "Four Years after U.S. Recognizes Genocide, Darfur Crisis Continues on Bush’s Watch" that they produce stories that say "On Obama's Watch" rather than writing glowingly about the smallest of things that he does.

It appears that there are a larger group of Africans that like what Bush has done in their countries than can be found in the group of Americans who are focused on. Unpopular at home, Bush basks in African praise.

There needs to be objective measures established as the grounds for comparison of these two presidents:

Before Bush/ After Bush / After Obama
  • Number of AIDS cases and resulting support
  • Condition of indebtedness from US banking institutions
  • Trade Levels
  • Assistance In Humanitarian relief

Sunday, December 7, 2008

The Black Progressive-Fundamentalists - Call The Names That Their White Liberal Emmissaries Are Not Allowed To Say

Offending Blog: Raving Black Lunatic

King Coon Returns

noun: (ethnic slur) offensive name for a Black person

The White Racist sleeps easy since he has so many ignorant Blacks operating with popular sanction doing what he would get attacked for if he chose to do it. He is quite pleased today with those who he has trained so well.

The person who green lights the content of "the Black lunatic" is such a person. Where as he no doubt wanted White America to evaluate Barack Obama based on his merits rather than on his race - Mr. Lunatic draws upon the most visible element of the honorable Justice Thomas' persona as he sounds just like an ignorant White racist would have sounded 50 years ago.

I have little doubt that Mr Lunatic is a frequent town crier for JUSTICE and RESPECT for Black people. This latest round if ignorance proves that HE DESERVES NEITHER since he is not able to extend it to those who he disagrees with.

Saturday, December 6, 2008

Why Are Black Progressive-Fundamentalist Bloggers Far More Likely To Talk About Bush Than About Their Local Democratic Leaders?

George W. Bush - A Masturbatory Figure For The Black Quasi-Socialist Progressive-Fundamentalist Racism Chaser

What’s Your Personal Thoughts/Experience On George W. Bush Legacy?

Why don't we ever hear:

  • People of New Orleans - What Is Your Experience On 35 Years Of Democratic Party domination and Black mayors? How does 5 days of a Federal Rescue trump decades of incompetence and corruption?
  • People of Baltimore - How does it feel in having no Republican Representative from local all the way up to the Presidency come Jan 20, 2009?
  • People of Philadelphia - with 14 out of 17 City Council people being Democrats - has your standard of living improved? If so - tell me why so many of my friends are exiting the city?
New Orleans post Katrina - Killing fields

Some Outlets Fortify My Choice To Not Vote For Obama

The Smirking Chimp

Where as most Black folks will point to some "conservative racists" as they attempt to paint those Blacks who are not Democrats as being in bed with people who hate us.......we only need to look at the bigger truth by reading the articles in "The Smirking Chimp".

Even the ignorant Ted Rall gets a hearing in this rag that found Obama favorable.

By Ted Rall - The Smirking Chimp

NEW YORK--A bunch of Clinton- and Carter-era hacks. George W. Bush's leftover defense secretary. Of the dozens of Obama's top appointments announced to date, there's only one liberal: David Bonior, who ran John Edwards' primary campaign, as secretary of labor. Maybe.

Remember the Democratic primaries? Among the top three presidential contenders, Edwards was the liberal. Hillary Clinton, she of repeated votes for war against Afghanistan and Iraq (and Iran!), was to Edwards' right. Obama, who also voted for war but didn't commit to Clinton's bigger healthcare plan, was even more conservative than she. "Mr. Obama," David Sanger writes in The New York Times, "is planning to govern from the center-right of his party."

If nothing else, I had guessed, the U. of Chicago egghead would appoint a team of the Best and Brightest. We're getting the Rest and the Rightest.

Asked by a reporter how his center-right coalition of Republicans, pro-war Democrats and other assorted has-beens squares with a campaign marketing hope, change, and Soviet-inspired propaganda posters, Obama pledged to "combine experience with fresh thinking."

Know The Progressive-Fundamentalist Operatives: Rev. Lennox Yearwood - Hip Hop Caucus

Rev. Lennox Yearwood

Yearwood is a progressive. I watched some episode of BET a few years ago and noted the style of this "Hip Hop reverend".

It is interesting that the man who fights against war and bloodshed has few words of rebuke for a Hip Hop star who will soon go to jail for possessing a machine gun that, if ever used, there was a 99% chance that a Black man would be in the gun sight as the trigger is pulled.

The key to understanding the Progressive-Fundamentalism Movement is to first understand that they must CONTROL THE AGENDA of what is focused upon.

  • Focus on The Iraq War but not the War On The Inner City Streets Of America (and not the Afghan War. This is the "good war" as this is "Obama's favored war".
  • If you do focus on the War In America's Urban Core - focus on how the guns got there, noting that "Black people don't manufacture guns". Don't focus on the fact that T.I. and other thugs placed an order for these guns via the underground network
  • When the subject of Drug Dealers come up - focus on how this society forced the Black guy to sell these drugs by undercutting his economic opportunity not on how in his lust for money and material items he chose this route - thus you have to focus on the diapers that he bought for his kid - not the accoutrement that he has purchased for his car
  • Also with drugs talk about the CIA and how "Black folks don't own any airplanes that fly internationally". Don't note that your Black brothers who are down with Hip Hop control all of the possible "last mile" routes from the middle men into the ghetto streets of the Black community.
PROGRESSIVISM IS NOT ORGANIC. Thus they must carefully control the message and always be on an OUTWARD STRUGGLE against some external threat which is threatening the people in the golden circle. It is quite ironic that in their ethos of non-judgmentalism they are willing to "accept all comers" to their cause - never making note of the damage that they do in contribution of the very things that they say deny opportunity to the favored masses.

Some Posters Just Leave Me Gasping With Amazement

From Blacksmythe

I intially stopped by simply to say hello and thanks for visiting my blog, However, I just read your entry for today and I'm busy gathering my thoughts to answer some of the frustrations of my close friends about Obama's cabinet choices. The fact is I am a huge fan of our President Elect, some might say I've gone a bit overboard. However, I think there are some very valid points being made in the argument against some of the recent choices. Quite a few of Obama's selections have worked for the former Clinton Administration. On one hand, Under Former President Clinton the country experienced a serious boom,unemployment rates dropped and over 10 million jobs were created. On another, I find myself finding serious credibility with the critics who suggest that this "governing from the center" does look like more of the same. I think many supporters such as myself are just super excited to breath some truly fresh air. Ofcourse, I was hoping for the real "rainbow coalition", some picks that would come in and radically change things. So, this evening I find myself really pondering how to answer my recent emails of concerns and some full out disgust. I still believe. President Elect Obama must navigate as a politician and it truly is a give/take to make things happen. At the end of the day, I don't think any citizen should point fingers. I am a forever supporter of President Elect Obama and feel that he as well as all of our reps. on a local,state and fed, level be held accountable. People have to stay awake, make noise and effectuate the change they want to see in this world. I asked a friend who their cabinet choices would be and they shared the following:

Secretary of Transportation: Maxine Waters
Secretary of Energy: Lester Brown
Sedretary of Commerce: Robert Reich (the only former Clinton staffer) or Barbara Lee
Secretary of Labor: Ralph "Uncle Tom" Nader or Barbara Ehrenreich
Secretary of INterior: Actually, I'd have to make this one Winona LaDuke, and make my...
Secretary of Agriculture someone else. Believe it or not, perhaps Jimmy Carter. Seriously!
Press Secretary: Either Brother Cornel West or Michael Eric Dyson, or perhaps even Sister Sonia Sanchez. I think we could use an eloquent, poetic, Press liaison who actually knew what he/she was talking about for once.

I'm still working on my response and list. Stay tuned into my blog, I'll get it up some time this week :)

"All work is a seed sown; it grows and spreads and sows itself anew”

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Selective Activists of Leisure Watch - Anti-Taser Activists

Electrocuted While Black

Tracking and reporting on pre-trial, extra-judicial death penalty, because it's 21st century lynching, by another name.

"Executed While Black" is a web site that I happened upon while visiting my friends at Jack and Jill Politics. JJP, in addition to being a free Obama campaign web site is also a member of the "Afrosphere" ring of Black bloggers. They promote themselves as promoting the best interests of Black people via their advocacy around certain issues.

Fair enough.

I have learned my job is not to challenge various Black Progressive-Fundamentalists on their RIGHT to focus upon anything that motivates them into action and outrage. Instead my goal is to develop a more clear outlook as to what the REAL THREATS are to Black people and then making the determination if those seeking "universal justice" are not biased in their coverage of these problems. I make use of statistics to tell the story on my behalf.

I call these people "Selective Activists Of Leisure" in that they are free to cherry pick about the focus of their advocacy. So much of their activism is IDEOLOGICAL in basis rather than PROPORTIONAL to the actual threats to the Black community. Thus it stands to reason that in protesting against the police - the authority - and their use of tasers, these activists feel that they are doing the Lord's work, speaking up for victims that everyone else has left behind.

Ironically - the taser was adopted as a means of providing law enforcement authorities with a non-lethal weapon to engage their criminal defendant as opposed to their firearm. I have little doubt that there would be a much greater record of death and injury that resulted from police interactions absent the use of taser. When have such rationalizations been of any use to an activist? Where as "one death at the hands of police" is one too many.......little guidance is given to individuals regarding their obligation in regards to not provoking a situation when in contact with law enforcement.

Do not get me wrong - I do believe that there are some law enforcement officials that misuse the taser and are in need of more training and more clear "rules of engagement". The taser should not be used as a punitive device but instead as a means of placing a combative subject who is under arrest into a submissive position so that he might be hand cuffed or placed in a cell. The exceptional incidents attract the news media and the activists.

According to the "Electrocuted While Black" site and Amnesty International:

Over 290 deaths nationwide

In the United States, more than 290 people have died since June 2001 after being struck by police Tasers, according to the human rights group Amnesty International. It said in October that only 25 of the 290 were armed, and none had firearms.

The group has called for a moratorium on Taser use until more research is done.

"We believe that they should be used as an alternative to lethal force," said Dori Dinsmore, the group's Midwest director, "not as a tool to ensure routine compliance."

A 2004 study from the group shows many of those who died had underlying health problems such as heart conditions or mental illness or were under the influence of drugs. Many also were subjected to repeated or prolonged shocks.

However, Taser International spokesman Steve Tuttle said of the 290 deaths that "in the vast majority of these tragic cases medical examiners have ruled that the Taser was not the cause of death." He said Taser use was listed as contributing factor in six cases since 1998.

He said studies cited in trials supported the company, which has not lost any of 61 product liability cases settled so far

I would like to put the onus upon the "Selective Activists of Leisure". What is their solution to allowing law enforcement authorities to subdue a suspect and place him under arrest?

As I read the blog roll of Black blog sites in support of the "Electrocuted While Black" issue I see how the setup will be waged: "Constructive Feedback is questioning why we are pursuing this issue where 'Black people are dying by the hands of the police'. Since we are trying to save BLACK LIVES and he is questioning our motivations and asking us about other issues....he must be trying to undercut our movement and thus.....he is against the best interests of Black people".

According to the web site of one member of the Afrospear - there have been 302 people killed in just ONE CITY thus far in 2008 - Philadelphia. We can use the statistics from previous years to make an interpolation that upwards of 80% of these 302 killed in Philly this year were Black people. Let me remind you - this is just ONE CITY in ONE YEAR that has not even ended yet. The 290 people who died after being tazed (sorry "electrocuted") covers a 7 year span AND the ENTIRE NATION?

Do you see my point?

Why is it that a particular gruop of activists gets to selectively choose which OUTRAGE they will cry "civil rights violations" upon, while being errily silent regarding a far, far, far bigger "Grim Reaper" that is in their midst?

How does one LOGICALLY look past the greater threats to the health and life of Black folks that go beyond the police and/or their use of tasers?

The greatest number of unchecked Civil Rights Violations in America today is happening IN some Black communities where crimes go unpunished due to witness intimidation far better than the Klan ever achieved.

What about the Black people who are victims of brutal crimes - burned just like the Lynch mob used to do:

If we were to focus our attention upon Blacks who are TOTALLY INNOCENT - absent any contributing acts that have rendered their deceased state - which is the greater population? Those who were "tasered to death" by the Police OR those Blacks who are now dead from stray bullets shot by "Drug Thugs"? (please note - this is but one modality of death - the stray bullet. I don't have enough free time in my hobby of blogging to document all of the other form of death rendered by the 'Drug Thugs'.

Afrospear has a right to advocate against the Police.
I have a right to advocate against those who refuse to address the REAL issues within our community per what the numbers indicate.

Alan Colmes - The Liberal That I Have Great Respect For

Alan Colmes is leaving 'Hannity & Colmes' TV show

My test of a liberal's ability to wage an honest debate is if he has command of the facts rather than needing to benefit from the presence of an "amen chorus" to allow him to make it through a debate.

While I don't agree with his perspective I have to give credit to Alan Colmes for being one of the best at stating his perspective and defending it.

Monday, November 24, 2008

NPR Points To White Hate Crimes Increase In LA. What Of Latino On Black And Vice Versa?

NPR'S Focus On White Supremacists

NPR: Experts Aim To Explain Spike In L.A. Hate Crimes

Last year, the number of hate crimes reported in Los Angeles County shot up 28 percent. It is a staggering increase when you realize that nationally the incidence of hate crimes actually declined slightly.

Among the reasons for the jump, some experts say, is a resurging white supremacist movement in Southern California.

One area resident says she was shocked during her morning commute one day in January as she drove by the tawny stucco houses and manicured lawns of Tarzana.

"Right where those boxes are right now was a giant swastika,"says Carol Koransky, pointing to a retaining wall in front of her. "And I don't remember if next to it said 'Kill the Jews' or 'F- - - the Jews.' "

Those bits of graffiti were the first in a long stretch of swastikas and profanity spray-painted along a two-mile route in the San Fernando Valley. Though Tarzana officials painted over the graffiti within hours, so many people had seen it on their trips to work, the story led the news for days.

Previous Reports About Black On Latino Hate Crimes In LA

So much for a black-brown coalition.

According to the 36-page 2007 Hate Crimes Report (PDF), thugs committed 763 “hate crimes” in 2007 in Los Angeles County, 28 percent higher than last year.

The majority of these crimes was motivated by bias against race/ethnicity and national origin. In “antiblack” crimes, 71 percent of suspects were hispanic; in anti-hispanic crimes, 56 percent of suspects were black. Blacks and hispanics are natural enemies (gang-bangers only?), it seems.

Latino On Black Hate Crimes Grow The Fastest

In what commission Executive Director Robin Toma called an alarming trend, hate crimes based on race, religion and sexual orientation all rose, increasing against nearly all groups -- including blacks, gays, Jews, Mexicans, whites and Asians -- even as crime in general declined.

The largest number of racial hate crimes involved Latino suspects against black victims, followed by black suspects against Latino victims. Latinos also made up the largest number of suspects in hate crimes based on sexual orientation. Whites were the leading suspects in religion-based incidents. Overall, blacks made up nearly half the hate crime victims, totaling 310.

"What we're seeing is the democratization of hate crimes," said Brian Levin, who directs the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at Cal State San Bernardino. "We're not only seeing a diversification of victims but also increased diversification of offenders."

Police agencies report hate crimes to the county, but because departments vary on when they pursue hate-crime charges, variations in hate-crime numbers can stem from an actual increase in crimes or from changes in reporting. In this case, experts said they believed that hate crimes themselves, not just the reporting of them, are rising.

It appears that the movie "Crash" is happening on the streets of LA today.

Latino leaders' silence is killing blacks

Davey D Speaks Out About Hate Crimes

LA Times

Sunday, November 23, 2008

With Obama - AJC's Cynthia Tucker Is Now Able To Attack Al Queda In Her Columns Rather Than The US President

Oh the benefits of Barack Obama!

Just to think - where as I figured that a certain attack merchant had no capacity to see what I was seeing in Iraq and Afghanistan and call out the other side who was guilty of so many things that she finds offensive in America (oppression, totalitarianism, sexism, etc) now I see that there are indeed some redeeming qualities in Cynthia Tucker. There only needed to be a BIGGER ENEMY than the "enemy" that she had previously been going after to attack for her to shift over to a critique on them.

Maybe if we got the entire Clayton County GA school board to attack Obama then we'd see Ms. Tucker talk about what is going on down there in one of her columns?

Cynthia Tucker AJC: Obama’s win a nightmare for al-Qaida

Just when it seemed the insults hurled at Barack Obama had reached the apex of absurdity, al-Qaida weighs in with a bit of retro name-calling of its own.

In a video released last week, Ayman al-Zawahiri, the top deputy to Osama bin Laden, denounced Obama as a “house Negro” and compared him unfavorably to “honorable black Americans” such as the late Malcolm X, the black nationalist who practiced Islam.

Zawahiri also showed a still photograph of Obama wearing a yarmulke while visiting Jerusalem’s Wailing Wall last summer. The implication was that Obama had become nothing more than a “tool of the Jews.”

(That’s a switch from the claim of some of Obama’s domestic critics, who fear he’s a secret Muslim who’ll hand the keys of the West Wing to bin Laden.)

While it’s a bit irritating to have an atavistic mass murderer presume to dictate appropriate politics for a black American, Zawahiri’s diatribe is good news. In fact, it may be the best news we’ve gotten in the struggle against al-Qaida since the so-called Sunni awakening in Iraq. Zawahiri and his fellow jihadists are clearly worried both about the symbolic power of an Obama presidency and about the smarter strategy against terrorism that Obama has laid out.

The hamfisted tactics favored by George W. Bush, including his ill-fated invasion of Iraq, were a gift to al-Qaida and its recruiting efforts. They allowed bin Laden and Zawahiri to paint the U.S. government as an imperial power bent on a 21st-century crusade against Islam.

However, that’s a more difficult argument to make when the Oval Office is occupied by a black man whose Kenyan grandfather was Muslim and who played with Muslim friends during his childhood years in Indonesia.

“Obama’s election has taken the wind out of al-Qaida’s sails in much of the Islamic world because it demonstrates America’s renewed commitment to multiculturalism, human rights and international law,” former National Security Council staffer Richard Clarke said. “It also proves to many that democracy can work and overcome ethnic, sectarian or racial barriers.”

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Cynthia Tucker on Marriage

Cynthia Tucker: Maybe marriage is the 'new thing'

Change is in the air.
Maybe Cynthia Tucker has indeed "changed".
Upon the election of Barack Obama she has went from attacking anything that smells "conservative" over to being Barack Obama's press agent.

Now her latest piece focuses on MARRIAGE and the positive attributes there in. I have seen this article discussed on many blogs. Most people seem enchanted by Ms. Tucker's reference to the Obama family and the positive imagery that streams from it. She then sets up an inferential "gravitational pull" where by people seeing the Obamas might be duly motivated to bask in the glories of marriage.

As a long time reader and critic of Ms. Tucker this leads me to a few questions that would tend to "smoke out" Mr Tucker from her apparent position of "change".

Ms Tucker -

* Since marriage is such a good thing - when you arrive at a fork in the road in which marriage is affirmed by certain cultural and/or legislative action will you draw upon the very same SYMBOLISM that you draw upon in your article and not stand opposed to the use of SYMBOLISM by other people when they too seek to use gravity? Or is your use of symbolism and gravity the only "good use" of it?

* More distinctly, Ms Tucker what if there is a more direct ENFORCEMENT ACTION where the "goodness" of marriage is more directly asserted within a culture? Will you write about the "abused married women" as a means of throwing a wrench in the machine? Or will you make the case that the ends justify the means and thus by enforcing a bias toward marriage more people will be brought under the covered pavilion of marriage - out of the rainstorm?

This is the problem that I have with you Ms. Tucker - in your "anti-conservator" stance where any direct structure placed so that a better societal outcome is produced is scorned by you. This despite that you clearly value the institution in question. You instead prefer the "soft nudge" type approach where you gently lead the horse to the water. This is expensive Mr Tucker. In the background of your plan is all sorts of government money having been duly redistributed from someone else's wallet who has been forced to make the societal investment.

What do you ask of the people who's condition will be measurably improved IF they are in fact placed within the framework that even you point out as valuable?

Correction - What do you ALLOW to happen to the people who REJECT the framework that you see as valuable? It is unthinkable to allow them to remain where they are? Where their own actions (and your tacit support) have allowed them to reside?

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Keith Olbermann - Disgusting Fraud

The White liberal will always use the Negro as the reference for his own agenda.

A Black male and a White woman seeking marriage IS NOT equivalent to a Black male and a White male marrying.

Here is my rebuttal:

Did you notice that this fraud, sorry, that Keith Olbermann said "What does it matter to you? At a time of FLY BY NIGHT RELATIONSHIPS......."

Do you see that this is the classic - "We are already failing on this other end.....why uphold this end" trick.

You and I both know that if "The Right" attempted a reaffirmation in which it attempted to uphold the sanctity of HETEROSEXUAL MARRIAGE that Keith Olberman (and cnulan) would wage a counter protest.

Do you see that Progressives first LIBERATE their cultural rules in the areas that they control and THEN they feign offense saying "Look at that area! We have already yield the fort wall over there....WHY are we holding fast on this other wall?"

Again - they usher in change and then use that CHANGE to point to the folly of holding forth.

Seems fraudulent to me.

The same people who talk of NATURALISM as it relates to avoiding genetically modified foods some how don't talk about the natural order of the functions of our human bodies when it comes to the reproductive system.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Why Some People Will Never Be President - And Thank Goodness

Local Democratic Domination Of Black Districts

My comments that may or may not have been edited off of a blog site. They don't appear there as of yet despite having posted them yesterday - so here they are:

[quote]your point about the (in)effectiveness of the governments in big cities is well taken, but that’s in part due to the lack of an electable alternative, which gets back to my point. to be electable a candidate has to be more about articulating what he’s for than he is about denouncing what he’s not, regardless of what party s/he represents. [/quote]


I can’t accept your analysis as specificed above. Here is why.

In my view the BLACK COMMUNITY CANNOT BE CONSUMERS, waiting for someone to OFFER us alternatives or, failing this, we continue on as we do, lumbering along - happy that “our political team” has won but depressed in the end because OUR COMMUNITY has still lost in the end.

For me the “alternative” is not REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRATS. My alternative if “What we are popularly doing is WORKING” or what we are popularly doing IS NOT WORKING to drive us to our COMMON GOALS.

These goals that I have identified after listening to a multitude of people of various ideologies are:

* Quality Schools to develop our children
* Safe Streets to allow us to maintain a strong community fabric
* Local Economic development to foster employment and trade
* Healthy lifestyles to promote long, disease and pain free lives

Black folks get too hung upon the the METHODOLOGY that is POPULARLY ASSUMED TO deliver these points rather than on the MEASUREMENTS that bear out that we are in fact making such advancement. In our current popular ethos - if we are failing to make progress it is because THE ENEMY is standing in our way.

If and when we find that THE ENEMY has departed (our cities) and left us all alone to run our own affairs then he has violated some national trust and thus we switch or “control our own communities” strategy into a “we must nationalize certain entitlements so that we are all able to eat” strategy.

I chose Baltimore but there are plenty of other cities and regions that have the same or similar domination of one party where we live in the most concentrated portions. What this is IS BLACK VOTER NULLFICATION. I have pointed out that the strategy that is being carried forth is well documented in various Progressive journals (

I give these operatives credit on running a brilliant strategy. The best way to buffer themselves from the requisite attacks on their failures to deliver despite gaining ground is to get the masses to focus on a NATIONAL take over BEFORE any of them should even begin to think about expecting benefits to be seen.

As with any journey where TRUST is a major element - some of the people who are walking along the journey and yet making note that the mile markers which should be notating their actual forward progress don’t seem to be accurate to SPEAK OUT and demand some earnest money which confirms that they will infact get the POT AT THE END OF THE RAINBOW rather than wait for the big payout that might never come - after they fall off of the cliff.

Saturday, November 8, 2008

"Soul Plan" Comes To CNN

How does DL Hugley and Monique get away with what they do?

They are the modern day Sambos in so much that they do and yet they are welcomed into the circle of the Black Political and Civil Rights establishment without missing a beat.

I will not forget "Soul Plane". It was written by a person who does not like Black people. It had to be!

Despite the fact that it was a comedy - I left the Magic Johnson Theater depressed.

If BET's Barbara Lee can be protested for her content - who is saying anything to CNN?

I bet that people were thinking that an advancement for Black people had been received when DL Hugley got a show on CNN. I see this as a step backward and degradation.

Where is your dignity Mr. Hugley?

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Cynthia Tuker - Some Of These People Are Right About You

This is going to be a long 4 years.
The haters and the ideological bigots who could not help themselves because of their depression for the last 8 years now will become cheerleaders and over the top.

Of course they are objective and they see what we could not see.

Stereotypes will crash and burn

By Cynthia Tucker | Wednesday, November 5, 2008, 06:30 AM

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

As I watched President-elect Barack Obama’s beautiful family take the stage Tuesday night, the other part of this huge historic moment came into view:

The nation will have a black first lady. We’ll see gorgeous little black girls cavorting about the White House lawn. In this country, paradigms shift and the culture changes through symbolism and theater: The mere sight of a black First Family will change perceptions about black women, about black children, about black families.

If Obama impressed the nation just by showing up at the debates speaking the Queen’s English, not lapsing into rhyme or rap, keeping his cool and answering questions intelligently, then his elegant and accomplished wife will surely impress with her style, her intellect and her devotion to her children. And aren’t those kids darling!

Stereotypes will crash and burn during an Obama administration.

Here are some choice responses that Ms. Tucker is not going to respond to.

Unfortunately many people will focus on the ignorant comments while ignoring the stinging ones which CALL CYNTHIA TUCKER WHAT SHE IDEOLOGICAL BIGOT.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Things to look forward to in an Obama Administration

Things to look forward to in an Obama Administration:

•The editorial cartoons of Mike Luckovich of the AJC which frequently appear in Time – will all of a sudden be positive

•The editorials of the AJC’s Cynthia Tucker and Jay Bookman will focus more on what the Republican minority is blocking rather than what the Democrats are failing to do

•Economists Paul Krugman and Dr Julianne Malveaux will go on the offense – supporting most of the economic policies of the new administration rather than painting the worst case, doomsday scenario regardless of what the numbers say pro or con

•The New York Times, MSNBC the remaining remnants of Air America will now want the United States to actually WIN in Afghanistan and Iraq

Monday, November 3, 2008

PAUL KRUGMAN - A Reprehensible Fellow

Instead, the Republican rump, the party that’s left after the election, will be the party that attends Sarah Palin’s rallies, where crowds chant “Vote McCain, not Hussein!” It will be the party of Saxby Chambliss, the senator from Georgia, who, observing large-scale early voting by African-Americans, warns his supporters that “the other folks are voting.” It will be the party that harbors menacing fantasies about Barack Obama’s Marxist — or was that Islamic? — roots.

Mr Krugman should actually visit Georgia where Democrats use race as a standard issue each political campaign.

Democrats Playing The Race Card

Why is it that Mr. Krugman is never dismissive of Democratic "the election was stolen" claims and likely has countless articles attesting to this?

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Notes On "The Black Flight Progressive"

Notating my own words posted on other sites:


(for context of my words: ) Today I traveled down to the "MLK Jr" historical district during church hour. My original intent was to capture in picture form what I had witnessed last night as I drove past the Black historical district of "Sweet Auburn" during the "Bush Depression in Black America": a thriving Black Professional class relaxing in an area that has been totally transformed thanks to the signs which only a short time ago said "Financing Provided By Bank Of America", etc. while the major construction was taking place.

When the church crowd came around on Sunday morning I saw a Barack Obama free campaign commercial/indoctrination village detaining how "the Negro has fused his racial develop hopes to the Democratic Party". There has never been more campaign touch points displayed in a particular square mile area anywhere else in America. Interestingly enough, however, the Black dirt poor and uneducated remained on the fringe of this same area. They would not be welcomed in the upscale establishments, however.

Long story short - there is a FORTH element that you must add to your list based on my ongoing research on the "Black Flight Progressive" who has departed his progressive enclaves, moving on toward good, conservative suburban living - per the license plates that I saw next to the "Obama 2008" stickers upon the cars.

Add to your list:

Four. CLAIM TO Reject the value of the HYPER PURSUIT of the material wealth which has been long denied to your people within a system built upon such accumulation....saying that such a strategy is counter to your ancestral ethos as to how one should treat the resources upon the earth and one's fellow man..... yet focus upon the INSULT of the denial and oppression as your driving force against your enemies as you seek to enter the halls of CAPITALISM. All the while you PRETEND that you are ignoring your personal pursuit of these material items despite the fact that your LIFESTYLE, PREFERENCE FOR ELITE EDUCATION and RESIDENTIAL LIVING PATTERNS tell the real truth within. Your own personal lust for these material goods is clandestinely embedded within the external claim that your actions are only motivated by your will to attack the system of capital accumulation, innocently seeking to make it MORE FAIR and working for all. (As long as a poor Black who was a descendant of slavery nor a Native American come to your front door and ask for THEIR FAIR SHARE directly from you rather than via the channel of GOVERNMENT......all is well within your world)

Cobb - I believe I have captured the thought of the "Black Flight Progressive" who LIVES amongst his ideological adversaries as a means of consuming the benefits of education, public safety and availability of quality retail outlets which their policies have brought forth to all who are within the exclusive class. At the same time he mentally masturbates himself into believing that HE is not a part of the system that DENIES OPPORTUNITY and seeks to SEGREGATE themselves from the commoner because HE DOES NOT VOTE FOR the conservative who's policies do just this....he just chooses to LIVE within the resource pools that his adversaries been crafted.

As long as there is an external enemy force that he can continue his perpetual fight against AND he is not called out for his own antics of complicity by the people he is departing once the community has been transformed into the very environment that he has long advocated for and checked out - then he is going to continue to do as he does.

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Recall When The Black Reporter Claimed That He Was Not Allowed Access To McCain Because He Was Black?

Washington Times kicked off Obama plane

Race vs Ideology

When I make the case that the White "racist" is akin to the "Black ideological bigot" this is what I am speaking of.

To be clear - White Racism is far more politically and socially deadly than is the ideological bigotry that might be shown by a Black person.

You are NOT going to see this story get any play on the Keith Olbermann show - the very show who quickly asked the Black guy who was denined press access by the "racist" McCain campaign due to his race. This is 'WHAT THEY DO' folks.

The United States As An Oil Exporter

The use of propaganda that is disguised as journalism is shameful.

After listening to this audio report from an anti-Oil Company operative and doing the research to validate her points I ran into some interesting tidbits of information.

NPR: Antonia Juhasz: 'Tyranny of Oil' Is A Grave Threat (I will do another post on my research from all that she said. I don't disagree with her on all points)

Leave it up to the Huffington Post to be the platform by which this propaganda that I am speaking of is given its platform.

Huffington Post: David Sasson - US Oil Exports Hit Record Pace. That's Right, Exports

Who knew that the US is currently exporting 1.8 million barrels of oil a day?

To make sure everybody does, Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), Chairman of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, sent a public letter to President Bush, asking him to "keep our oil at home."

The rest of the article is nothing more than a "guilt by association" hit job against the evil Bush Administration.

Sadly you must go to another source in order to get the FACTUAL information as to why US refiners are exporting petroleum products.

MSNBC Answer Desk: I just read that refineries are exporting diesel. Is that true? And if it is true, then it proves how the oil companies are manipulating the prices!

You're half right. Yes, despite its role as the world’s largest importer of oil and refined products, the U.S. also exports fossil fuels. As of March, the latest data available, U.S. oil refiners were exporting more than 1.8 million barrels a day of crude oil, gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and other refined products. The top five destinations for U.S. fuel were Mexico, Canada, the Netherlands, Chile and Singapore.

But no, the export of crude oil and refined fuels doesn’t prove anything about pump prices. What it proves is that crude oil and gasoline are global commodities. They are produced in dozens of countries around the world and consumed pretty much everywhere.

Since the market for oil and fuels is also global, it doesn’t matter where it came from. What matters is where the seller can get the best price. Since oil tankers burn fossil fuels to get where they’re going, higher fuel costs have increased the cost of shipping. So if you’re looking to buy or sell oil or gasoline, you’d rather deal with someone close by.

This is an unintential piece of information:

refineries in the United States are U.S.-owned. For example, Venezuela owns the three CITGO refineries in the United States. Most of the 750,000 barrels a day of fuel produced at those refineries is sold at the nation's 14,000 CITGO gas stations, but about 30,000 barrels a day is shipped back to Venezuela, where you can fill up for the government-subsidized price of 19 cents a gallon.

It’s also true that the U.S. exports crude oil — but only little. According to the latest Department of Energy figure, about 29,000 barrels of U.S. crude left the country in March — and all of it went to Canada, which sends roughly 2.5 million barrels day our way.

Sunday, October 26, 2008

The Fight Against An Oppressive Order VS The Ability To Build Up Order Out Of Chaos

Notation of my own words

[quote]Facts be damned, you just make up and insert whatever elements are required to keep your internal game in play - no matter how disjoint or bizarre.[/quote]

My good friend cnulan - I have enough confidence in my own sanity, the ability for me to make valid observations of the real world AND also to detect the LACK of ability of those who stand opposed to my views to pick apart anything but mere elements of my arguments rather than dismiss them in their entirety. Instead I receive "English lessons" rather than fundamental correction. The absence of rebuke allows me to keep rolling forward. Show me the errors in my reasoning. (If you indeed want me to yield my tax money to help another in need - why don't you work to fix my reasoning if I too are in need of a reality check - so that I can work FOR rather than against the interests of the Black man - rather than echoing White conservatives who seek to destroy us? you say)

The sad part about it all cnulan and brotherbrown - most of my views are simply based on the POINTS OF GRIEVANCE that are popularly heard WITHIN THE BLACK COMMUNITY turned around and transformed into analysis that is put upon you and the others who are in the state of aggrievement. The problem is that they run afoul to your preference to have YOUR IDEOLOGY and YOUR PARTY be the primary vehicles for the FIX. The fact that I have the nerve to indict you as part of the problem which needs to be reset on the path of solution will not have my named mentioned when "brother of the year" awards are handed out. With you two as judges I don't stand a chance of even being asked to clean off the table at the awards ceremony.

Over time I have learned that there is a very distinct difference between those who are able to VOICE their disgust about their aggregate situation AND their willingness to accept the results of careful analysis that dares suggest a fix in which THEY MUST CHANGE rather than the system before them being the primary agent of change. Some people want the SYSTEM to change and thus have this change "RAIN DOWN UPON THEM" from external sources whereas the "unwashed and the ignorant" are able to continue doing what they do and thus will receive cleansing, transforming them into a "repaired state" after the good works of their leaders who guided the pack, defraying questions until the end of the journey.

After all as the logic goes since they are VICTIMS of the system that has ran afoul of their interests.....upon successfully "fighting the power" and thus the system forced into correction - the conversation of what THEY MUST DO IN SUPPORT OF EFFECTIVE CHANGE is never an essential part of the discussion. The constant PURSUIT of a "level playing field" is.

cnulan - if you can't see that the concept of "there's gold at the end of the rainbow if you just have HOPE and FAITH and stay unified with me as we fight our EXTERNAL ENEMIES" is not the milieu of progressivism then I am not sure if you are as much of a detached observer of financial and behavioral systems as you let out to be.

Thus when an important issue regarding SOCIETAL/SOCIAL NORMS comes up for consideration it is the PROGRESSIVE who takes the lead and who seeks to knock down any thing that he sees as discriminator or which is a bound to anyone's free will. It is nothing more than his "fight the power" disposition.

Please notice, cnulan, there needs to be a societal FOUNDATION present that the progressive works against as he steps in the middle and becomes the liberator and is featured in the photo op. If, by contrast their is an assemblage of HUMAN POTENTIAL that is scattered wreckage at his feet and he is charged with ORDERING THE PEOPLE SO THAT THEY SEE THEIR OWN SELF-WORTH AND THUS EXPRESS THEIR GREATNESS....ON THEIR OWN BACKS BY TEMPORARILY CHANNELING ALL OF THE MASSES TOWARD A COMMON GOAL THAT IS ACHIEVED ORGANICALLY which also involves SUPPRESSING THEIR ERRANT WAYS which might threaten the see that the PROGRESSIVE is WHOLLY UNQUALIFIED to lead his people toward this change at this juncture in these people's development is in question. He will take offense that THE VICTIM was asked to do the heavy lifting.

The Progressive is all about WIDENING a narrow gate rather than getting a disbursed flock who is in disorder to walk together through a NARROW MOUNTAIN RANGE that is permanently fixed. He promotes the masquerade of expansive JUSTICE above the need for collective sacrifice that ASKS OF ALL MEMBERS to do their part - including the VICTIMS. In his mind it is UNFAIR that the mountain pass is aligned in such a way.

He promotes himself as an environmentalist and a naturalist but he is unwilling to cede to the implicit and self evident natural order of certain issues of order when acquiescence to this natural truth is trumped by THE WILL OF MAN to do otherwise! He rejects societal regulation of such things as being oppressive of the will of man. He is primarily a SECULAR HUMANIST with the will of the individual man trumping this natural order.

Even if the imposition of such ORDER is the solution to that which he is most aggrieved about WITHIN - he will instead pursue his forte - charging after his external adversary who is the proponent of enforcing this order upon him and the masses. It is THIS ADVERSARY who is the denier of his serenity rather than his own ability to order his own people. Even when his adversary moves away and allows his version of order to predominate the domain where he resides - he will reengage his adversary within the place that he has departed to. He needs the resources that is to be shared as evidence of the social contract but his adversary needs to keep his judgments to himself as the "social contract" doesn't have any clauses on behavior of the INDIVIDUAL which lead to a liability upon the system. (No wonder few people want to live near him. He is a net confiscator and dependent).

When will this foolish man learn that all is not subject to RATIONALIZATION BY MAN, but sometimes things just "beez that way!" ? Since they have worked thus far for those who ARE ACTUALLY held responsible for BUILDING UP and HOLDING THE SYSTEM TOGETHER he might want to adopt some of these restrictions the day that he assumes the responsibility for BUILDING and MAINTAIN rather than LIBERATING!!!

Treat Other's Children As You Treat Your Own - Not Just By Giving Them Money But Also Guidance

Again - just documenting my own thoughts as posted on another venue upon my own archives.

Blog: Cobb
Subject: Same Sex Marriage

brotherbrown: Don't get me wrong, if it were up to me, I want my children to be heterosexual, to marry the person of their dreams, punch out a coupla kids and live happily ever after. So let me ask you, if one of your children were gay and wanted to marry someone, you would refuse to participate on the principle that it is not a real marriage?

Liberal brotherbrown:

Would you place any prohibitions on the sexual activities of your young gay son or daughter since they can't get pregnant from these acts?

If you had a straight son or daughter and you loaded them up with condoms - do you see the need to intervene and "slow their roll" if you noted that they had multiple partners who they were juggling around? Got protections - no big deal - right?

There seemingly is no end to your liberalism yet also no end to the demands that the government pick up and repair all of the pieces that remain from the voids that the societal arraignments that you tolerate hath created.

You are making an ass of yourself, CF. Way too many false assumptions about me. You'd do much better with me by not doing that.

brotherbrown - I think that I have you down. But its not just you.

On the one hand we have the theory that we are "all in this together". This works in the domain of resource distribution to create societal "fairness" as argued by some. If there is a pattern of problems among certain segments of people it is the fault of some systematic failure to address them. People who think a certain way look toward the courts and the legislature to make the fix.

All the while within this discussion is a major domain of discussion that is not brought up in this discussion of "all that government can do to fix society". That point that is never mentioned by some is the concept of the CULTURE that is imprinted upon the society which often times have an equal or greater force upon that segment of the population than anything the government could hope to accomplish.

I envy the progressive, brotherbrown. As a progressive you are always there offering tolerance and opportunity to those who only wish to live free. You have never "oppressed" anyone by enforcing societal norms. Instead you and other go off and REMOVE those norms which you call "bigotry".

It just so happens that the "Judeo-Christian" framework that we currently live within has endured at least a millennium. Yet in the brilliance that you and others have evolved to - not only has man mastered the elements, those who are enlightened figure that they have also mastered the ways of man. That which has happened to other societies "won't happen to us. We are smarter than they were. We'll do it right this time".

What I don't understand is how on the one hand the big talking point about the issue of educational funding that I am researching is built upon the concept of "WHAT WOULD YOU WANT FOR YOUR CHILDREN" as we are asked to apply these same funds to other people's children. Yet when it comes to applying the very social mores that apparently you have for your own children so that they might stay an appropriate course - you and others suggest that these values not radiate beyond the four walls of your own house. To impose upon anyone beyond that is judgmentalism and getting into other people's business.

brotherbrown - this is not JUST about same sex marriage. This is but one step on a long, winding trail downward. This has everything to do with the standards as set by the Judeo-Christian set of norms and those who have retired from their youthful activism but now apply this same concept of "I know better" now that they are working in official channels.

I would have less of a problem with the progressive if only he were more willing to stand and account for the bastard child that he produces in society. Instead his past shows that upon opening up additional societal tolerances where an increasing number of threads in society must be shred in order to increase its accommodation - the consequences that are identified will be promoted to the actions of the government to address. Thus the slippery slope is twisted into the circular reference for resources to address the resulting damage to the people. You all speak government but are loathed to talk CULTURE and the strictures within.

You will always be a better man that I am brotherbrown. You have never suppressed any man from what he wills to do nor have you ever denied him resources after the fact. As long as there is enough of a reservoir of resources that can be tapped and YOU are not the primary source from which all of this is drawn from and thus you don't have to primarily stand behind your creation - the world will never see any push back from you.

Thus I am not sure that you are of "greater moral intellect" as compared to me. I figure that you don't have the direct and exclusive skin in the game in which you feel the consequences of your actions.

Progressivism doesn't construct cultures.
It slowly erodes them.
It is not organic.
It is confiscatory.